» Articles » PMID: 21964573

Identification of Genetic Elements That Autonomously Determine DNA Methylation States

Overview
Journal Nat Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2011 Oct 4
PMID 21964573
Citations 212
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cytosine methylation is a repressive, epigenetically propagated DNA modification. Although patterns of DNA methylation seem tightly regulated in mammals, it is unclear how these are specified and to what extent this process entails genetic or epigenetic regulation. To dissect the role of the underlying DNA sequence, we sequentially inserted over 50 different DNA elements into the same genomic locus in mouse stem cells. Promoter sequences of approximately 1,000 bp autonomously recapitulated correct DNA methylation in pluripotent cells. Moreover, they supported proper de novo methylation during differentiation. Truncation analysis revealed that this regulatory potential is contained within small methylation-determining regions (MDRs). MDRs can mediate both hypomethylation and de novo methylation in cis, and their activity depends on developmental state, motifs for DNA-binding factors and a critical CpG density. These results demonstrate that proximal sequence elements are both necessary and sufficient for regulating DNA methylation and reveal basic constraints of this regulation.

Citing Articles

DNA methylation shapes the Polycomb landscape during the exit from naive pluripotency.

Richard Albert J, Urli T, Monteagudo-Sanchez A, Le Breton A, Sultanova A, David A Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2024; 32(2):346-357.

PMID: 39448850 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-024-01405-4.


Epigenetics Research in Evolutionary Biology: Perspectives on Timescales and Mechanisms.

Yi S Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(9).

PMID: 39235767 PMC: 11376073. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae170.


Genome access is transcription factor-specific and defined by nucleosome position.

Grand R, Pregnolato M, Baumgartner L, Hoerner L, Burger L, Schubeler D Mol Cell. 2024; 84(18):3455-3468.e6.

PMID: 39208807 PMC: 11420395. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.08.009.


The impact of the embryonic DNA methylation program on CTCF-mediated genome regulation.

Monteagudo-Sanchez A, Richard Albert J, Scarpa M, Noordermeer D, Greenberg M Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(18):10934-10950.

PMID: 39180406 PMC: 11472158. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae724.


Epigenetic and genetic risk of Alzheimer disease from autopsied brains in two ethnic groups.

Ma Y, Reyes-Dumeyer D, Piriz A, Recio P, Mejia D, Medrano M Acta Neuropathol. 2024; 148(1):27.

PMID: 39177846 PMC: 11343944. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-024-02778-y.


References
1.
Lorincz M, Schubeler D, Hutchinson S, Dickerson D, Groudine M . DNA methylation density influences the stability of an epigenetic imprint and Dnmt3a/b-independent de novo methylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 22(21):7572-80. PMC: 135678. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.21.7572-7580.2002. View

2.
Dulac C . Brain function and chromatin plasticity. Nature. 2010; 465(7299):728-35. PMC: 3075582. DOI: 10.1038/nature09231. View

3.
Levasseur D, Wang J, Dorschner M, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Orkin S . Oct4 dependence of chromatin structure within the extended Nanog locus in ES cells. Genes Dev. 2008; 22(5):575-80. PMC: 2259027. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1606308. View

4.
Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M, Takahashi K . The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell. 2003; 113(5):631-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00393-3. View

5.
Gebhard C, Benner C, Ehrich M, Schwarzfischer L, Schilling E, Klug M . General transcription factor binding at CpG islands in normal cells correlates with resistance to de novo DNA methylation in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010; 70(4):1398-407. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3406. View