» Articles » PMID: 21960489

Systematic Differences Between Lean and Obese Adolescents in Brain Spin-lattice Relaxation Time: a Quantitative Study

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Oct 1
PMID 21960489
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Emerging evidence suggests that obese adolescents show changes in brain structure compared with lean adolescents. In addition, obesity impacts body development during adolescence. We tested a hypothesis that T1, a marker of brain maturation, can show brain differences associated with obesity.

Materials And Methods: Adolescents similar in sex, family income, and school grade were recruited by using strict entry criteria. We measured brain T1 in 48 obese and 31 lean adolescents by quantitative MR imaging at 1.5T. We combined MPRAGE and inversion-recovery sequences with normalization to standard space and automated skull stripping to obtain T1 maps with a symmetric voxel volume of 1 mm(3).

Results: Sex, income, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and fasting glucose did not differ between groups, but obese adolescents had significantly lower HDL, higher LDL, and higher fasting insulin levels than lean adolescents. Intracranial vault volume did not differ between groups, but obese adolescents had smaller intracranial vault-adjusted brain parenchymal volumes. Obese adolescents had 4 clusters (>100 contiguous voxels) of T1 relaxation that were significantly different (P < .005) from those in lean adolescents. Three of these clusters had longer T1s in obese adolescents (in the orbitofrontal and parietal regions), and 1 cluster had shorter T1s, compared with lean adolescents.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that obesity may have a significant impact on brain development, especially in the frontal and parietal lobes. It is unclear if these changes persist into adulthood or whether they indicate that obese subjects follow a different developmental trajectory during adolescence.

Citing Articles

Effects of Body Mass Index and Body Fat Percent on Default Mode, Executive Control, and Salience Network Structure and Function.

Figley C, Asem J, Levenbaum E, Courtney S Front Neurosci. 2016; 10:234.

PMID: 27378831 PMC: 4906227. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00234.


Boosting your brain, part 2: the hard way.

Castillo M AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 34(5):917-8.

PMID: 22790247 PMC: 7964647. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3229.

References
1.
Manfredonia F, Ciccarelli O, Khaleeli Z, Tozer D, Sastre-Garriga J, Miller D . Normal-appearing brain t1 relaxation time predicts disability in early primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2007; 64(3):411-5. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.64.3.411. View

2.
Gunstad J, Paul R, Cohen R, Tate D, Spitznagel M, Grieve S . Relationship between body mass index and brain volume in healthy adults. Int J Neurosci. 2008; 118(11):1582-93. DOI: 10.1080/00207450701392282. View

3.
Bandettini P . What's new in neuroimaging methods?. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1156:260-93. PMC: 2716071. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04420.x. View

4.
Gold S, Dziobek I, Sweat V, Tirsi A, Rogers K, Bruehl H . Hippocampal damage and memory impairments as possible early brain complications of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2007; 50(4):711-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-007-0602-7. View

5.
Saito N, Sakai O, Ozonoff A, Jara H . Relaxo-volumetric multispectral quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the brain over the human lifespan: global and regional aging patterns. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 27(7):895-906. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.05.006. View