» Articles » PMID: 21931817

Growth-arrest-specific Protein 2 Inhibits Cell Division in Xenopus Embryos

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Sep 21
PMID 21931817
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Growth-arrest-specific 2 gene was originally identified in murine fibroblasts under growth arrest conditions. Furthermore, serum stimulation of quiescent, non-dividing cells leads to the down-regulation of gas2 and results in re-entry into the cell cycle. Cytoskeleton rearrangements are critical for cell cycle progression and cell division and the Gas2 protein has been shown to co-localize with actin and microtubules in interphase mammalian cells. Despite these findings, direct evidence supporting a role for Gas2 in the mechanism of cell division has not been reported.

Methodology And Principal Findings: To determine whether the Gas2 protein plays a role in cell division, we over-expressed the full-length Gas2 protein and Gas2 truncations containing either the actin-binding CH domain or the tubulin-binding Gas2 domain in Xenopus laevis embryos. We found that both the full-length Gas2 protein and the Gas2 domain, but not the CH domain, inhibited cell division and resulted in multinucleated cells. The observation that Gas2 domain alone can arrest cell division suggests that Gas2 function is mediated by microtubule binding. Gas2 co-localized with microtubules at the cell cortex of Gas2-injected Xenopus embryos using cryo-confocal microscopy and co-sedimented with microtubules in cytoskeleton co-sedimentation assays. To investigate the mechanism of Gas2-induced cell division arrest, we showed, using a wound-induced contractile array assay, that Gas2 stabilized microtubules. Finally, electron microscopy studies demonstrated that Gas2 bundled microtubules into higher-order structures.

Conclusion And Significance: Our experiments show that Gas2 inhibits cell division in Xenopus embryos. We propose that Gas2 function is mediated by binding and bundling microtubules, leading to cell division arrest.

Citing Articles

Insights into Structure and Function of Growth Arrest Specific 2 (GAS2).

Ma W, Lin J, Ma R, Bai Y, Wu D, Zhang X J Cancer. 2025; 16(1):146-156.

PMID: 39744572 PMC: 11660135. DOI: 10.7150/jca.102893.


Growth arrest-specific protein 2 (GAS2) interacts with CXCR4 to promote T-cell leukemogenesis partially via c-MYC.

Ma W, Wan Y, Zhang J, Yao J, Wang Y, Lu J Mol Oncol. 2022; 16(20):3720-3734.

PMID: 36054080 PMC: 9580887. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13306.


Cochlear supporting cells require GAS2 for cytoskeletal architecture and hearing.

Chen T, Rohacek A, Caporizzo M, Nankali A, Smits J, Oostrik J Dev Cell. 2021; 56(10):1526-1540.e7.

PMID: 33964205 PMC: 8137675. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.017.


Growth arrest-specific 2 protein family: Structure and function.

Zhang N, Zhao C, Zhang X, Cui X, Zhao Y, Yang J Cell Prolif. 2020; 54(1):e12934.

PMID: 33103301 PMC: 7791176. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.12934.


Pathogenicity-associated protein domains: The fiercely-conserved evolutionary signatures.

Patel S Gene Rep. 2020; 7:127-141.

PMID: 32363241 PMC: 7185390. DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2017.04.004.


References
1.
Li L, Li X, Francke U, Cohen S . The TSG101 tumor susceptibility gene is located in chromosome 11 band p15 and is mutated in human breast cancer. Cell. 1997; 88(1):143-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81866-8. View

2.
Mitelman F, Mertens F, Johansson B . A breakpoint map of recurrent chromosomal rearrangements in human neoplasia. Nat Genet. 1997; 15 Spec No:417-74. DOI: 10.1038/ng0497supp-417. View

3.
Pines M, Housden B, Bernard F, Bray S, Roper K . The cytolinker Pigs is a direct target and a negative regulator of Notch signalling. Development. 2010; 137(6):913-22. PMC: 2834460. DOI: 10.1242/dev.043224. View

4.
Schneider C, King R, Philipson L . Genes specifically expressed at growth arrest of mammalian cells. Cell. 1988; 54(6):787-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)91065-3. View

5.
Grinnell F, Petroll W . Cell motility and mechanics in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009; 26:335-61. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113318. View