» Articles » PMID: 21931626

Calculation of Direct Antiretroviral Treatment Costs and Potential Cost Savings by Using Generics in the German HIV ClinSurv Cohort

Abstract

Unlabelled: BACKGROUND/AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aimed to determine the cost impacts of antiretroviral drugs by analysing a long-term follow-up of direct costs for combined antiretroviral therapy, cART, -regimens in the nationwide long-term observational multi-centre German HIV ClinSurv Cohort. The second aim was to develop potential cost saving strategies by modelling different treatment scenarios.

Methods: Antiretroviral regimens (ART) from 10,190 HIV-infected patients from 11 participating ClinSurv study centres have been investigated since 1996. Biannual data cART-initiation, cART-changes, surrogate markers, clinical events and the Centre of Disease Control- (CDC)-stage of HIV disease are reported. Treatment duration was calculated on a daily basis via the documented dates for the beginning and end of each antiretroviral drug treatment. Prices were calculated for each individual regimen based on actual office sales prices of the branded pharmaceuticals distributed by the license holder including German taxes.

Results: During the 13-year follow-up period, 21,387,427 treatment days were covered. Cumulative direct costs for antiretroviral drugs of €812,877,356 were determined according to an average of €42.08 per day (€7.52 to € 217.70). Since cART is widely used in Germany, the costs for an entire regimen increased by 13.5%. Regimens are more expensive in the advanced stages of HIV disease. The potential for cost savings was calculated using non-nucleotide-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor, NNRTI, more frequently instead of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, PI/r, in first line therapy. This calculation revealed cumulative savings of 10.9% to 19.8% of daily treatment costs (50% and 90% substitution of PI/r, respectively). Substituting certain branded drugs by generic drugs showed potential cost savings of between 1.6% and 31.8%.

Conclusions: Analysis of the data of this nationwide study reflects disease-specific health services research and will give insights into the cost impacts of antiretroviral therapy, and might allow a more rational allocation of resources within the German health care system.

Citing Articles

Optimization of HIV testing services in Germany using HIV indicator diseases: study protocol of the HeLP study.

Valbert F, Koppe U, Schmidt D, Krings A, Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer B, Droge P Arch Public Health. 2023; 81(1):159.

PMID: 37626414 PMC: 10464271. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01161-9.


Cost-savings and potential cost-savings through the distribution of generic antiretroviral drugs within the statutory health insurance market of Germany between January 2017 and June 2019.

Lottes M, Bremer V, Prugger C, Kollan C, Schmidt D BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):63.

PMID: 35027062 PMC: 8756633. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07390-4.


Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting.

Degroote S, Vandekerckhove L, Vogelaers D, Vanden Bulcke C PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0262533.

PMID: 35025957 PMC: 8758085. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262533.


Generic substitution of antiretrovirals: patients' and health care providers' opinions.

Kieran J, OReilly E, ODea S, Bergin C, OLeary A Int J STD AIDS. 2017; 28(12):1239-1246.

PMID: 28632475 PMC: 5606299. DOI: 10.1177/0956462417696215.


The choice between a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor- and a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen for initiation of antiretroviral treatment - results from an observational study in Germany.

Mahlich J, Gross M, Kuhlmann A, Bogner J, Heiken H, Stoll M J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017; 9:39.

PMID: 28050254 PMC: 5203724. DOI: 10.1186/s40545-016-0092-4.


References
1.
Davidson I, Beardsell H, Smith B, Mandalia S, Bower M, Gazzard B . The frequency and reasons for antiretroviral switching with specific antiretroviral associations: the SWITCH study. Antiviral Res. 2010; 86(2):227-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.03.001. View

2.
Green C, MacLure M, Fortin P, Ramsay C, Aaserud M, Bardal S . Pharmaceutical policies: effects of restrictions on reimbursement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (8):CD008654. PMC: 6791298. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008654. View

3.
Mannheimer S, Matts J, Telzak E, Chesney M, Child C, Wu A . Quality of life in HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy is related to adherence. AIDS Care. 2005; 17(1):10-22. DOI: 10.1080/09540120412331305098. View

4.
Hellstrom J, Rudholm N . Side effects of generic competition?. Eur J Health Econ. 2005; 5(3):203-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-004-0234-5. View

5.
Waning B, Kaplan W, King A, Lawrence D, Leufkens H, Fox M . Global strategies to reduce the price of antiretroviral medicines: evidence from transactional databases. Bull World Health Organ. 2009; 87(7):520-8. PMC: 2704041. DOI: 10.2471/blt.08.058925. View