» Articles » PMID: 21931481

Effects of an Antibacterial Membrane on Osteoblast-like Cells in Vitro

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2011 Sep 21
PMID 21931481
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Infection around membranes is often found in guided bone regeneration (GBR). The excellent antibacterial properties of Ag-nHA-nTiO(2)/polyamide-66 (PA66) nanocomposite membranes have been demonstrated previously. The aim of this study was to observe the microstructure of an Ag-nHA-nTiO(2)/PA66 membrane and its effects on osteoblast-like cells in vitro. An Ag-nHA-nTiO(2)/PA66 membrane was used in the experimental group, and both nHA/PA66 and expanded poly tetrafluroethylene (e-PTFE) membranes were set as control. MG63 osteoblast-like cells were cultured on the three kinds of membrane and tissue culture polystyrene (TCP). The microstructure of the above membranes and the cells adhered on them were detected by scanning electronic microscope (SEM). Cell proliferation was determined by 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, cell viability with a cell viability analyzer, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and Ca(2+) concentration of osteoblast-like cell matrix by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. SEM showed that both Ag-nHA-nTiO(2)/PA66 membranes and nHA/PA66 membranes were composed of porous obverse face and smooth opposite face. The e-PTFE membranes showed elliptic surface structure with many tiny lined cracks. The MG63 cells adhered and proliferated well on all three kinds of membranes. Though cell viability on Ag-nHA-nTiO(2)/PA66 membranes was significantly lower than that of the control groups (P < 0.05), MTT values, ALP activity, and Ca(2+) concentration did not differ significantly among the three kinds of membranes (P > 0.05). From these findings, it can be concluded that Ag-nHA-nTiO(2)/PA66 membranes are as biocompatible as nHA/ PA66 membranes and TCP, thus may be applied safely in GBR.

Citing Articles

Bioceramic scaffolds with two-step internal/external modification of copper-containing polydopamine enhance antibacterial and alveolar bone regeneration capability.

Jiang X, Lei L, Sun W, Wei Y, Han J, Zhong S J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2024; 25(1):65-82.

PMID: 38163667 PMC: 10758211. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B23d0004.


Advances in Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques.

Yang Z, Wu C, Shi H, Luo X, Sun H, Wang Q Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:921576.

PMID: 35814003 PMC: 9257033. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.921576.


Modifications of Polymeric Membranes Used in Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration.

Florjanski W, Orzeszek S, Olchowy A, Grychowska N, Wieckiewicz W, Malysa A Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11(5).

PMID: 31052482 PMC: 6572646. DOI: 10.3390/polym11050782.


Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?.

Omar O, Elgali I, Dahlin C, Thomsen P J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46 Suppl 21:103-123.

PMID: 30667525 PMC: 6704362. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13068.


Behavior of osteoblasts on TI surface with two different coating designed for orthodontic devices.

Fleischmann L, Crismani A, Falkensammer F, Bantleon H, Rausch-Fan X, Andrukhov O J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015; 26(1):5335.

PMID: 25577216 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5335-9.


References
1.
Cerroni L, Filocamo R, Fabbri M, Piconi C, Caropreso S, Condo S . Growth of osteoblast-like cells on porous hydroxyapatite ceramics: an in vitro study. Biomol Eng. 2002; 19(2-6):119-24. DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0344(02)00027-8. View

2.
Engelke W, Diederichs C, JACOBS H, Deckwer I . Alveolar reconstruction with splitting osteotomy and microfixation of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12(3):310-8. View

3.
Hallab N, Bundy K, OConnor K, Moses R, Jacobs J . Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Eng. 2001; 7(1):55-71. DOI: 10.1089/107632700300003297. View

4.
Juan L, Zhimin Z, Anchun M, Lei L, Jingchao Z . Deposition of silver nanoparticles on titanium surface for antibacterial effect. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010; 5:261-7. PMC: 2865021. DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s8810. View

5.
Dupoirieux L, Pourquier D, Picot M, Neves M . Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 30(1):58-62. DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0011. View