» Articles » PMID: 21922010

A New Scale for Measuring Reward Responsiveness

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2011 Sep 17
PMID 21922010
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

SEVERAL PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORIES ASSUME THAT THERE ARE TWO BASIC BRAIN MECHANISMS THAT GUIDE BEHAVIOR: an avoidance or inhibition system, which is responsive to signals of punishment, and an approach or activation system, which is sensitive to signals of reward. Several self-report scales have been developed to assess the sensitivity to punishment and reward, and these instruments have been shown to be useful in research on personality, psychopathology, and underlying biological substrates. However, it is also true that in particular scales for measuring reward responsiveness (RR) suffer from various inadequacies. Therefore, a new RR scale was developed and subjected to an extensive psychometric evaluation. The results show that this scale measures a single factor, RR that is clearly independent of punishment sensitivity. Further, the data indicated that the internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, and predictive properties of the new scale were all adequate. It can be concluded that the RR scale is a psychometrically sound instrument that may be useful for researchers with interest in the personality construct of RR.

Citing Articles

Subjective Assessment of Rdoc-Related Constructs in Addiction and Compulsive Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Ribeiro A, Muhlbauer J, Piquet-Pessoa M, de-Salles-Andrade J, Felix-da-Silva C, Fontenelle L Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025; 21(6):477-508.

PMID: 39839599 PMC: 11745032. DOI: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240603.


Prospective associations between early adolescent reward functioning and later dimensions of psychopathology.

Mattoni M, Pegg S, Kujawa A, Klein D, Olino T J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024; 133(8):630-637.

PMID: 39480331 PMC: 11890115. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000942.


The short- and longer-term effects of brief behavioral parent training versus care as usual in children with behavioral difficulties: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

van Doornik R, Van der Oord S, Luijckx J, Groenman A, Leijten P, Luman M BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):203.

PMID: 38475768 PMC: 10936011. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05649-8.


Emotion dysregulation and reward responsiveness as predictors of autonomic reactivity to an infant cry task among substance-using pregnant and postpartum women.

Bounoua N, Tabachnick A, Eiden R, Labella M, Dozier M Dev Psychobiol. 2023; 66(1):e22449.

PMID: 38131244 PMC: 10752434. DOI: 10.1002/dev.22449.


Testing an insurance-based monetary incentive program for exercise: RCT design and rationale.

Williams D, Bohlen L, Dunsiger S, Ayala-Heredia V, Griffin E, Dionne L Contemp Clin Trials. 2023; 135:107382.

PMID: 37935304 PMC: 10698803. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107382.


References
1.
Dickman S . Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990; 58(1):95-102. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.1.95. View

2.
Elliot A, Thrash T . Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002; 82(5):804-18. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.804. View

3.
WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

4.
Franken I, Rassin E, Muris P . The assessment of anhedonia in clinical and non-clinical populations: further validation of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). J Affect Disord. 2006; 99(1-3):83-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.08.020. View

5.
Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S . The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. View