» Articles » PMID: 33727857

Dopaminergic Regulation of Reward System Connectivity Underpins Pain and Emotional Suffering in Migraine

Overview
Journal J Pain Res
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2021 Mar 17
PMID 33727857
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: It has been suggested that reward system dysfunction may account for emotion and pain suffering in migraine. However, there is a lack of evidence whether the altered reward system connectivity is directly associated with clinical manifestations, including negative affect and ictal pain severity and, at the molecular level, the dopamine (DA) D2/D3 receptors (D2/3Rs) signaling implicated in encoding motivational and emotional cues.

Patients And Methods: We acquired resting-state functional MRI from interictal episodic migraine (EM) patients and age-matched healthy controls, as well as positron emission tomography (PET) with [C]raclopride, a selective radiotracer for DA D2/3Rs, from a subset of these participants. The nucleus accumbens (NAc) was seeded to measure functional connectivity (FC) and DA D2/3Rs availability based on its essential involvement in pain-related aversive/reward functions. Associations of the brain measures with positive/negative affect and ictal pain severity were also assessed.

Results: Compared with controls, the EM group showed weaker right NAc connectivity with areas implicated in pain and emotional regulation, such as the amygdala, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and thalamus; but showed stronger left NAc connectivity with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and lingual gyrus. Moreover, among the altered NAc connectivities, only right NAc-amygdala connectivity was inversely correlated with DA D2/3Rs availability in migraine patients (diagnostic group-by-D2/3Rs interaction p < 0.007). At a clinical level, such weaker NAc-amygdala connectivity was associated with lower interictal positive affect and greater ictal pain severity over the head and facial extension area (pain area and intensity number summation, PAINS).

Conclusion: Together, our findings suggest that altered reward system connectivity, specifically between the NAc and amygdala, might be affected by endogenous DA D2/3Rs signaling, and such process might be a neural mechanism that underlies emotional and pain suffering in episodic migraineurs.

Citing Articles

Endogenous opioid receptors and the feast or famine of maladaptive feeding.

K Sutton Hickey A, Matikainen-Ankney B Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2270.

PMID: 40050623 PMC: 11885478. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57515-0.


Potential hypothalamic mechanisms in trigeminal neuropathic pain: a comparative analysis with migraine and cluster headache.

Islam J, Rahman M, Ali M, Kc E, Park Y J Headache Pain. 2024; 25(1):205.

PMID: 39587517 PMC: 11587712. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01914-z.


Plasma pQTL and brain eQTL integration identifies PNKP as a therapeutic target and reveals mechanistic insights into migraine pathophysiology.

Lou J, Tu M, Xu M, Cao Z, Song W J Headache Pain. 2024; 25(1):202.

PMID: 39578729 PMC: 11585170. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01922-z.


Shifts in structural connectome organization in the limbic and sensory systems of patients with episodic migraine.

Noh E, Namgung J, Park Y, Jang Y, Lee M, Park B J Headache Pain. 2024; 25(1):99.

PMID: 38862883 PMC: 11165833. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01806-2.


High-definition tDCS over primary motor cortex modulates brain signal variability and functional connectivity in episodic migraine.

Lim M, Kim D, Nascimento T, DaSilva A Clin Neurophysiol. 2024; 161:101-111.

PMID: 38460220 PMC: 11610772. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.02.012.


References
1.
Lanteri-Minet M, Radat F, Chautard M, Lucas C . Anxiety and depression associated with migraine: influence on migraine subjects' disability and quality of life, and acute migraine management. Pain. 2005; 118(3):319-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.09.010. View

2.
Skorobogatykh K, van Hoogstraten W, Degan D, Prischepa A, Savitskaya A, Ileen B . Functional connectivity studies in migraine: what have we learned?. J Headache Pain. 2019; 20(1):108. PMC: 6868768. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-019-1047-3. View

3.
Scott D, Heitzeg M, Koeppe R, Stohler C, Zubieta J . Variations in the human pain stress experience mediated by ventral and dorsal basal ganglia dopamine activity. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(42):10789-95. PMC: 6674764. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2577-06.2006. View

4.
WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

5.
Raij T, Valkonen-Korhonen M, Holi M, Therman S, Lehtonen J, Hari R . Reality of auditory verbal hallucinations. Brain. 2009; 132(Pt 11):2994-3001. PMC: 2768657. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp186. View