Factors That May Influence the Classification of Sleep-wake by Wrist Actigraphy: the MrOS Sleep Study

Overview

Journal J Clin Sleep Med

Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry

Date 2011 Sep 8

PMID 21897772

Citations 55

Authors

Terri Blackwell

Sonia Ancoli-Israel

Susan Redline

Katie L Stone

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Objectives: Total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep latency (SOL) and wake after sleep onset (WASO) assessed by actigraphy gathered in 3 different modes were compared to polysomnography (PSG) measurements to determine which mode corresponded highest to PSG. Associations of measurement error for TST (PSG-actigraphy) with demographics, medical history, exam data, and sleep characteristics were examined.

Methods: Participants underwent in-home 12-channel PSG. Actigraphy data were collected in 3 modes: proportional integration mode (PIM), time above threshold (TAT) and zero crossings mode (ZCM). The analysis cohort was a subgroup of 889 men (mean age 76.4 years) from the MrOS Sleep Study with concurrently measured PSG and actigraphy. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to compare the association between PSG and actigraphy.

Results: The PIM mode of actigraphy corresponded moderately to PSG for all measures (ICCs 0.32 to 0.57), TAT a little lower (ICCs 0.17 to 0.47), and ZCM lower still (ICCs 0.16 to 0.33). The PIM mode corresponded best to PSG (ICCs TST 0.57; SE 0.46; SOL 0.23; WASO 0.54), though the estimations from PSG and PIM mode differed significantly (p < 0.01). The PIM mode overestimated TST by 13.2 min on average, but underestimated TST for those in certain subgroups: those with excessive daytime sleepiness, less sleep fragmentation, or more sleep disordered breathing (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Sleep parameters from the PIM and TAT modes of actigraphy corresponded reasonably well to PSG in this population, with the PIM mode correlating highest. Systematic measurement error was observed within subgroups with different sleep characteristics.

Citing Articles

Closed-Loop Auditory Stimulation (CLAS) During Sleep Augments Language and Discovery Learning.

Clark V, Valverde H, Briggs M, Mullins T, Ortiz J, Pirrung C Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595901 PMC: 11591805. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111138.

Multidimensional Sleep Profiles via Machine learning and Risk of Dementia and Cardiovascular Disease.

Cavailles C, Wallace M, Leng Y, Stone K, Ancoli-Israel S, Yaffe K medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39228701 PMC: 11370502. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.19.24312248.

Quantifying the effects of sleep on sensor-derived variables from upper limb accelerometry in people with and without upper limb impairment.

Miller A, Lang C, Bland M, Lohse K J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):86.

PMID: 38807245 PMC: 11131201. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01384-z.

Estimating sleep duration: performance of open-source processing of actigraphy compared to in-laboratory polysomnography in the community.

Sansom K, Reynolds A, McVeigh J, Mazzotti D, Dhaliwal S, Maddison K Sleep Adv. 2023; 4(1):zpad028.

PMID: 37485312 PMC: 10362889. DOI: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad028.

Measuring Sleep Quality in the Hospital Environment with Wearable and Non-Wearable Devices in Adults with Stroke Undergoing Inpatient Rehabilitation.

Pellegrini M, Lannin N, Mychasiuk R, Graco M, Kramer S, Giummarra M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36900995 PMC: 10001748. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053984.

References

Jean-Louis G, Mendlowicz M, Gillin J, Rapaport M, Kelsoe J, Zizi F . Sleep estimation from wrist activity in patients with major depression. Physiol Behav. 2000; 70(1-2):49-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00228-6. View

Jean-Louis G, Zizi F, Von Gizycki H, Hauri P . Actigraphic assessment of sleep in insomnia: application of the Actigraph Data Analysis Software (ADAS). Physiol Behav. 1999; 65(4-5):659-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00213-3. View

Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C, Chambers M, Moorcroft W, Pollak C . The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep. 2003; 26(3):342-92. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/26.3.342. View

Jean-Louis G, Kripke D, Cole R, Assmus J, Langer R . Sleep detection with an accelerometer actigraph: comparisons with polysomnography. Physiol Behav. 2001; 72(1-2):21-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00355-3. View

Sivertsen B, Omvik S, Havik O, Pallesen S, Bjorvatn B, Nielsen G . A comparison of actigraphy and polysomnography in older adults treated for chronic primary insomnia. Sleep. 2006; 29(10):1353-8. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/29.10.1353. View

Mullaney D, Kripke D, MESSIN S . Wrist-actigraphic estimation of sleep time. Sleep. 1980; 3(1):83-92. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/3.1.83. View

Hyde M, ODriscoll D, Binette S, Galang C, Tan S, Verginis N . Validation of actigraphy for determining sleep and wake in children with sleep disordered breathing. J Sleep Res. 2007; 16(2):213-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2007.00588.x. View

Teng E, Chui H . The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987; 48(8):314-8. View

Jean-Louis G, Kripke D, MASON W, Elliott J, Youngstedt S . Sleep estimation from wrist movement quantified by different actigraphic modalities. J Neurosci Methods. 2001; 105(2):185-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00364-2. View

10.

Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

11.

BARONE J, Roberts H . Caffeine consumption. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996; 34(1):119-29. DOI: 10.1016/0278-6915(95)00093-3. View

12.

Blank J, Cawthon P, Carrion-Petersen M, Harper L, Johnson J, Mitson E . Overview of recruitment for the osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS). Contemp Clin Trials. 2005; 26(5):557-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.05.005. View

13.

Blackwell T, Redline S, Ancoli-Israel S, Schneider J, Surovec S, Johnson N . Comparison of sleep parameters from actigraphy and polysomnography in older women: the SOF study. Sleep. 2008; 31(2):283-91. PMC: 2225568. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/31.2.283. View

14.

Paquet J, Kawinska A, Carrier J . Wake detection capacity of actigraphy during sleep. Sleep. 2007; 30(10):1362-9. PMC: 2266273. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/30.10.1362. View

15.

Johns M . Sensitivity and specificity of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT), the maintenance of wakefulness test and the epworth sleepiness scale: failure of the MSLT as a gold standard. J Sleep Res. 2000; 9(1):5-11. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2000.00177.x. View

16.

Buysse D, Reynolds 3rd C, Monk T, BERMAN S, Kupfer D . The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989; 28(2):193-213. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. View

17.

Johnson N, Kirchner H, Rosen C, Storfer-Isser A, Cartar L, Ancoli-Israel S . Sleep estimation using wrist actigraphy in adolescents with and without sleep disordered breathing: a comparison of three data modes. Sleep. 2007; 30(7):899-905. PMC: 1978368. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/30.7.899. View

18.

Hopkins W . Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000; 30(1):1-15. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001. View

19.

Pahor M, Chrischilles E, Guralnik J, Brown S, Wallace R, Carbonin P . Drug data coding and analysis in epidemiologic studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994; 10(4):405-11. DOI: 10.1007/BF01719664. View

20.

Buysse D, Reynolds 3rd C, Monk T, Hoch C, Yeager A, Kupfer D . Quantification of subjective sleep quality in healthy elderly men and women using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Sleep. 1991; 14(4):331-8. View