» Articles » PMID: 21887533

Delayed Presentation of Splenic Rupture Following Colonoscopy: Clinical and CT Findings

Overview
Journal Emerg Radiol
Date 2011 Sep 3
PMID 21887533
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical and CT findings in patients with symptomatic colonoscopy-induced splenic rupture, and to assess for common features among this cohort. Multi-center search yielded 11 adults with symptomatic splenic injury related to colonoscopy. Workup included abdominal CT in 10 (91%) cases and abdominal radiography in two patients (one patient had both). Colonoscopy findings, post-procedural course, and CT findings were systematically reviewed. Mean patient age was 62.2 years (range, 51-84 years); 8 (73%) of 11 were female. The majority (64%) of colonoscopies were for screening. No immediate complications were reported at optical colonoscopy; tortuosity/redundancy was noted in five cases. Except for a small (8 mm) polyp in one case and a large (10 mm) polyp in another, the remaining nine patients had either diminutive or no polyps. Only one patient presented with hemodynamic instability during post-colonoscopy recovery; the other ten had a delayed presentation ranging from 8 h to 8 days (mean, 2.1 days). All 11 patients presented with abdominal pain. CT was diagnostic for splenic injury with subcaspular and/or perisplenic hematoma in all ten CT cases. Hemoperitoneum was present in eight, visible splenic laceration in three cases, and splenic artery pseudoaneurysm in one case. Five patients underwent splenectomy (four emergent) and six patients were treated conservatively. Average hospital stay was 5.5 days (range, 3-10 days). Colonoscopy-induced splenic rupture characteristically presents as a delayed and often serious complication. In cases of apparent non-traumatic splenic hematoma or rupture at CT, eliciting a history of recent colonoscopy may identify the etiology.

Citing Articles

Splenic injury associated with colonoscopy in hospitalized patients: Incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome.

Koop H, Skupnik C, Schnoor T, Horenkamp-Sonntag D Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(12):E1453-E1457.

PMID: 39691743 PMC: 11651917. DOI: 10.1055/a-2453-2350.


Splenic artery embolisation for splenic injury during colonoscopy: A systematic review.

Lukies M, Clements W United European Gastroenterol J. 2023; 12(1):44-55.

PMID: 38047383 PMC: 10859723. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12498.


Effects of laparoscopic splenectomy on surgical site wound infection in patients with spleen rupture: A meta-analysis.

Deng Y, Zhang X, Li A, Zhao Y, Ye L Int Wound J. 2023; .

PMID: 37872696 PMC: 10828121. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14440.


Hemoperitoneum after routine colonoscopy: A case report.

Amory R, Nijs Y Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023; 105:108044.

PMID: 36989631 PMC: 10074571. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108044.


Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication.

Ullah W, Rashid M, Mehmood A, Zafar Y, Hussain I, Sarvepalli D World J Gastrointest Surg. 2020; 12(2):55-67.

PMID: 32128029 PMC: 7044106. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i2.55.


References
1.
Rabeneck L, Paszat L, Hilsden R, Saskin R, Leddin D, Grunfeld E . Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135(6):1899-1906, 1906.e1. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.058. View

2.
Kim D, Pickhardt P, Taylor A, Leung W, Winter T, Hinshaw J . CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(14):1403-12. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa070543. View

3.
Tse C, Chung K, Hwang J . Prevention of splenic injury during colonoscopy by positioning of the patient. Endoscopy. 1998; 30(6):S74-5. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1001358. View

4.
Janes S, Cowan I, Dijkstra B . A life threatening complication after colonoscopy. BMJ. 2005; 330(7496):889-90. PMC: 556163. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7496.889. View

5.
Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A, Noakes M, Taylor S . Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology. 2006; 239(2):464-71. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2392051101. View