Pressure Pain Threshold Testing Demonstrates Predictive Ability in People with Acute Whiplash
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Study Design: Longitudinal cohort study.
Objectives: To determine whether pressure pain threshold (PPT), tested at 2 standardized sites, could provide additional prognostic ability to predict short-term outcomes in people with acute whiplash, after controlling for age, sex, and baseline pain intensity.
Background: PPT may be a valuable assessment and prognostic indicator for people with whiplash-associated disorder. The extent to which PPT can predict short-term disability scores has yet to be explored in people with acute (of less than 30 days in duration) whiplash-associated disorder in a clinical setting.
Methods: Eligible patients were recruited from community-based physiotherapy clinics in Canada. Baseline measurements included PPT, as well as pain intensity, age, and sex. Neck-related disability was collected with the Neck Disability Index 1 to 3 months after PPT testing. Multiple linear regression models were constructed to evaluate the unique contribution of PPT in the prediction of follow-up disability scores.
Results: A total of 45 subjects provided complete data. A regression model that included sex, baseline pain intensity, and PPT at the distal tibialis anterior site was the most parsimonious model for predicting short-term Neck Disability Index scores 1 to 3 months after PPT testing, explaining 38.6% of the variance in outcome. None of the other variables significantly improved the predictive power of the model.
Conclusion: Sex, pain intensity, and PPT measured at a site distal to the injury were the most parsimonious set of predictors of short-term neck-related disability score, and represented promising additions to assessment of traumatic neck pain. Neither age nor PPT at the local site was able to explain significant variance beyond those 3 predictors. Limitations to interpretation are addressed.
Jeong G, Lee B J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).
PMID: 38541838 PMC: 10971228. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061612.
Evans D, Rushton A, Middlebrook N, Bishop J, Barbero M, Patel J JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(8):e2228870.
PMID: 36018591 PMC: 9419019. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28870.
Schwank A, Struyf T, Struyf F, Blazey P, Mertens M, Gisi D BMJ Open. 2022; 12(8):e058803.
PMID: 35926993 PMC: 9358941. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058803.
Susceptibility to movement-evoked pain following resistance exercise.
Kodesh E, Sirkis-Gork A, Mankovsky-Arnold T, Shamay-Tsoory S, Weissman-Fogel I PLoS One. 2022; 17(7):e0271336.
PMID: 35862479 PMC: 9302845. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271336.
Alipour H, Gazerani P, Heidari M, Dardmeh F Pain Res Manag. 2021; 2021:5563959.
PMID: 34257764 PMC: 8261181. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5563959.