» Articles » PMID: 21881087

The Breast Screening Programme and Misinforming the Public

Overview
Journal J R Soc Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Sep 2
PMID 21881087
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The information provided to the public by the NHS Breast Screening Programme has been criticized for lack of balance, omission of information on harms and substantially exaggerated estimates of benefit. These shortcomings have been particularly evident in the various invitation leaflets for breast screening and in the Programme's own 2008 Annual Review, which celebrated 20 years of screening. The debate on screening has been heated after new data published in the last two years questioned the benefit and documented substantial harm. We therefore analysed whether the recent debate and new pivotal data about breast screening has had any impact on the contents of the new 2010 leaflet and on the 2010 Annual Review. We conclude that spokespeople for the Programme have stuck to the beliefs about benefit that prevailed 25 years ago. Concerns about over-diagnosis have not been addressed either and official documents still downplay this most important harm of breast cancer screening.

Citing Articles

Decisions to decline breast screening and/or breast cancer treatment based on the potential harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment: a qualitative study.

Jeffers S, Pilnick A, Armstrong N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e089155.

PMID: 39658288 PMC: 11647357. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089155.


Online information about mammography screening in Italy from 2014 to 2021.

Attena F, Abagnale L, Avitabile A BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1):132.

PMID: 35477449 PMC: 9044849. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01718-w.


Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening.

Robra B Recent Results Cancer Res. 2021; 218:85-104.

PMID: 34019164 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63749-1_7.


Online information about risks and benefits of screening mammography in 10 European countries: An observational Web sites analysis.

Spagnoli L, Navaro M, Ferrara P, Del Prete V, Attena F Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(22):e10957.

PMID: 29851843 PMC: 6393047. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010957.


A Review and Comparative Analysis of Information Targeted to the General Public on the Websites of Breast Screening Programs in Canada.

Kearney A, Polisena J, Morrison A Healthc Policy. 2017; 13(2):57-67.

PMID: 29274227 PMC: 5749524. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2017.25322.


References
1.
Gotzsche P, Nielsen M . Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (4):CD001877. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub3. View

2.
Duffy S, Tabar L, Olsen A, Vitak B, Allgood P, Chen T . Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England. J Med Screen. 2010; 17(1):25-30. PMC: 3104821. DOI: 10.1258/jms.2009.009094. View

3.
Jorgensen K, Zahl P, Gotzsche P . Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study. BMJ. 2010; 340:c1241. PMC: 2844939. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c1241. View

4.
Nystrom L, Rutqvist L, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S . Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993; 341(8851):973-8. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v. View

5.
Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I . Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA. 2009; 302(15):1685-92. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1498. View