» Articles » PMID: 12204020

Breast Cancer Screening: a Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Overview
Journal Ann Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2002 Sep 3
PMID 12204020
Citations 293
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To synthesize new data on breast cancer screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Data Sources: MEDLINE; the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry; and reference lists of reviews, editorials, and original studies.

Study Selection: Eight randomized, controlled trials of mammography and 2 trials evaluating breast self-examination were included. One hundred fifty-four publications of the results of these trials, as well as selected articles about the test characteristics and harms associated with screening, were examined.

Data Extraction: Predefined criteria were used to assess the quality of each study. Meta-analyses using a Bayesian random-effects model were conducted to provide summary relative risk estimates and credible intervals (CrIs) for the effectiveness of screening with mammography in reducing death from breast cancer.

Data Synthesis: For studies of fair quality or better, the summary relative risk was 0.84 (95% CrI, 0.77 to 0.91) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after approximately 14 years of observation was 1224 (CrI, 665 to 2564). Among women younger than 50 years of age, the summary relative risk associated with mammography was 0.85 (CrI, 0.73 to 0.99) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after 14 years of observation was 1792 (CrI, 764 to 10 540). For clinical breast examination and breast self-examination, evidence from randomized trials is inconclusive.

Conclusions: In the randomized, controlled trials, mammography reduced breast cancer mortality rates among women 40 to 74 years of age. Greater absolute risk reduction was seen among older women. Because these results incorporate several rounds of screening, the actual number of mammograms needed to prevent one death from breast cancer is higher. In addition, each screening has associated risks and costs.

Citing Articles

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Literature Review of Clinical Uses for Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Oncology.

Chung W, Tang Y, Cheung Y Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766044 PMC: 11674923. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244143.


Interpretation of specification for breast cancer screening, early diagnosis, and treatment management in Chinese women.

Ma F, Wu J, Fu L, Li A, Lan B, Chen K J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 1(3):97-100.

PMID: 39036376 PMC: 11256670. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.07.003.


Mammary neoplasms in female dogs: Clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.

Rueda J, Porto C, Franco R, da Costa I, Bueno L, Girio R Vet Med (Praha). 2024; 69(4):99-114.

PMID: 38751991 PMC: 11093647. DOI: 10.17221/4/2024-VETMED.


Knowledge of Non-Invasive Biomarkers of Breast Cancer, Risk Factors, and BSE Practices Among Nursing Undergraduates in Farasan Island, KSA.

Sayed S, Dailah H, Nagarajan S, Abdelwahab S, Abadi S, Akhtar N SAGE Open Nurs. 2024; 10:23779608241248519.

PMID: 38681865 PMC: 11055480. DOI: 10.1177/23779608241248519.


Cancer mortality in workers at risk of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in a company in the nuclear sector headquarters in São Paulo.

Vieira G, Martinez M, Cardoso M Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2024; 27:e240011.

PMID: 38511821 PMC: 10946289. DOI: 10.1590/1980-549720240011.