» Articles » PMID: 21861544

Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (FluMist®; Fluenz™): a Review of Its Use in the Prevention of Seasonal Influenza in Children and Adults

Overview
Journal Drugs
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2011 Aug 25
PMID 21861544
Citations 126
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is an intranasally administered trivalent, seasonal influenza vaccine that contains three live influenza viruses (two type A [H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes] and one type B). LAIV was effective in protecting against culture-confirmed influenza caused by antigenically matched and/or distinct viral strains in children aged ≤71 months enrolled in three phase III trials. LAIV was superior to trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in protecting against influenza caused by antigenically-matching viral strains in a multinational phase III trial in children aged 6-59 months. LAIV was also significantly more effective than TIV in decreasing the incidence of culture-confirmed influenza illness in two open-label studies (in children with recurrent respiratory tract illnesses aged 6-71 months and in children and adolescents with asthma aged 6-17 years). LAIV did not differ significantly from placebo in preventing febrile illnesses in adults (primary endpoint) enrolled in a phase III trial. However, LAIV significantly reduced the incidence of febrile upper respiratory tract illnesses (URTI), severe febrile illnesses, febrile URTI-related work absenteeism and healthcare provider use. In another well designed trial in adults, LAIV significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic, laboratory-confirmed influenza compared with placebo (but not intramuscular TIV). LAIV was generally well tolerated in most age groups, with the majority of adverse events being mild to moderate in severity, and runny nose/nasal congestion being the most common. In a large phase III trial, LAIV, compared with TIV, was associated with an increased incidence of medically significant wheezing in vaccine-naive children aged <24 months and an increased incidence of hospitalization in children aged 6-11 months; LAIV is not approved for use in children <24 months. LAIV was not always associated with high rates of seroconversion/seroresponse, particularly in older children and adults, or in subjects with detectable levels of haemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies at baseline. However, LAIV did elicit mucosal (nasal) IgA antibody responses and strong cell-mediated immunity responses. Only one confirmed case of LAIV virus transmission to a placebo recipient (who did not become ill) occurred in a transmission study conducted in young children. The immunogenic response to LAIV in young healthy children was not affected by concomitant administration with other commonly administered childhood vaccines. In conclusion, intranasal LAIV seasonal influenza vaccine is effective and well tolerated in children, adolescents and adults. LAIV was more effective than TIV in children, although this advantage was not seen in adults. In the US, LAIV is indicated for the active immunization of healthy subjects aged 2-49 years against influenza disease caused by virus subtypes A and type B contained in the vaccine.

Citing Articles

Calboxyvinyl polymer adjuvant enhances respiratory iga responses through mucosal and systemic administration.

Sasaki E, Asanuma H, Momose H, Maeyama J, Moriyama S, Nagata N NPJ Vaccines. 2025; 10(1):28.

PMID: 39934182 PMC: 11814125. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-025-01086-0.


The Strategies Used by Animal Viruses to Antagonize Host Antiviral Innate Immunity: New Clues for Developing Live Attenuated Vaccines (LAVs).

Chen N, Zhang B Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39852825 PMC: 11768843. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13010046.


Respiratory delivered vaccines: Current status and perspectives in rational formulation design.

Wu L, Xu W, Jiang H, Yang M, Cun D Acta Pharm Sin B. 2025; 14(12):5132-5160.

PMID: 39807330 PMC: 11725141. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.08.026.


Intranasal influenza-vectored vaccine expressing pneumococcal surface protein A protects against Influenza and Streptococcus pneumoniae infections.

Cardoso K, de Souza L, da Silva Santos B, de Carvalho K, da Silva Messias S, de Faria Goncalves A NPJ Vaccines. 2024; 9(1):246.

PMID: 39702744 PMC: 11659394. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-024-01033-5.


Intranasal Immunization with Nasal Immuno-Inducible Sequence-Fused Antigens Elicits Antigen-Specific Antibody Production.

Sasaki H, Suzuki Y, Morimoto K, Takeda K, Uchida K, Iyoda M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684539 PMC: 11641730. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312828.


References
1.
He X, Holmes T, Zhang C, Mahmood K, Kemble G, Lewis D . Cellular immune responses in children and adults receiving inactivated or live attenuated influenza vaccines. J Virol. 2006; 80(23):11756-66. PMC: 1642596. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01460-06. View

2.
Breiman R, Brooks W, Goswami D, Lagos R, Borja-Tabora C, Lanata C . A multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of live attenuated influenza vaccine coadministered with oral poliovirus vaccine in healthy young children. Vaccine. 2009; 27(40):5472-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.002. View

3.
Belshe R, Gruber W, Mendelman P, Mehta H, Mahmood K, Reisinger K . Correlates of immune protection induced by live, attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intranasal influenza virus vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2000; 181(3):1133-7. DOI: 10.1086/315323. View

4.
Lambert L, Fauci A . Influenza vaccines for the future. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(21):2036-44. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1002842. View

5.
Ashkenazi S, Vertruyen A, Aristegui J, Esposito S, McKeith D, Klemola T . Superior relative efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine compared with inactivated influenza vaccine in young children with recurrent respiratory tract infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006; 25(10):870-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000237829.66310.85. View