» Articles » PMID: 21849719

The Effect of Skin Thermistor Fixation Method on Weighted Mean Skin Temperature

Overview
Journal Physiol Meas
Date 2011 Aug 19
PMID 21849719
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of three different skin thermistor attachment methods on weighted mean skin temperature (WMT(sk)) at three different ambient temperatures (approximately 24 °C (TEMP); approximately 30 °C (WARM); approximately 35 °C (HOT)) compared to uncovered thermistors. Eleven, non-acclimated, volunteers completed three 5 min bouts of submaximal cycling (approximately 70 W mechanical work)-one at each environmental condition in sequential order (TEMP, WARM, HOT). One thermistor was fixed to the sternal notch whilst four skin thermistors were spaced at 3 cm intervals on each of the sites on the limbs as per the formula of Ramanathan (1964 J. Appl. Physiol. 19 531-3). Each thermistor was either held against the skin uncovered (UC) or attached with surgical acrylic film dressing (T); surgical acrylic film dressing and hypoallergenic surgical tape (TT) or surgical acrylic film dressing, hypoallergenic surgical tape and surgical bandage (TTC). The WMT(sk) calculated was significantly lower in UC compared to T, TT and TTC (p < 0.001, d = 0.46), in T compared to TT and TTC (p < 0.001, d = 0.33) and in TT compared to TTC (p < 0.001; d = 0.25). The mean differences (across the three temperatures) were + 0.27 ± 0.34 °C, + 0.52 ± 0.35 °C and + 0.82 ± 0.34 °C for T, TT and TTC, respectively. The results demonstrate that the method of skin thermistor attachment can result in the significant over-estimation of weighted mean skin temperature.

Citing Articles

A century of exercise physiology: concepts that ignited the study of human thermoregulation. Part 2: physiological measurements.

Notley S, Mitchell D, Taylor N Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 123(12):2587-2685.

PMID: 37796291 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05284-3.


Thermoregulatory responses during road races in hot-humid conditions at the 2019 Athletics World Championships.

Aylwin P, Havenith G, Cardinale M, Lloyd A, Ihsan M, Taylor L J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023; 134(5):1300-1311.

PMID: 37022963 PMC: 10190834. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00348.2022.


A Thermal Skin Model for Comparing Contact Skin Temperature Sensors and Assessing Measurement Errors.

MacRae B, Spengler C, Psikuta A, Rossi R, Annaheim S Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(14).

PMID: 34300649 PMC: 8309895. DOI: 10.3390/s21144906.


Validity of contact skin temperature sensors under different environmental conditions with and without fabric coverage: characterisation and correction.

MacRae B, Annaheim S, Stampfli R, Spengler C, Rossi R Int J Biometeorol. 2018; 62(10):1861-1872.

PMID: 30062610 DOI: 10.1007/s00484-018-1589-0.


Skin Temperature Measurement Using Contact Thermometry: A Systematic Review of Setup Variables and Their Effects on Measured Values.

MacRae B, Annaheim S, Spengler C, Rossi R Front Physiol. 2018; 9:29.

PMID: 29441024 PMC: 5797625. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00029.