» Articles » PMID: 21810777

Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery: a Preliminary Clinical Experience

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2011 Aug 4
PMID 21810777
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To report a single institution's experience with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and its clinical outcomes.

Study Design: Preliminary clinical data from a prospective TORS study.

Setting: University tertiary care facility.

Subjects And Methods: Patients who underwent TORS at The Ohio State University Medical Center. Demographic, intraoperative, clinicopathological, and follow-up functional data were collected.

Results: Sixty-four patients underwent TORS with a median age of 56.9 years. A total of 113 TORS procedures were performed. Fifty-four patients with squamous cell cancer (SCCA) were included in the final analysis. Mean follow-up time was 11.8 months (range, 2-29). There was a trend toward longer TORS setup time, operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay with advanced (T(3)) compared with early-stage tumors (T(1-2)). There were no major intraoperative complications, and none of the procedures were aborted because of inability to remove the tumor. Negative resection margins were achieved in 93% of cases of SCCA. No patients experienced immediate postoperative complications, and all of the patients tolerated an oral diet without any airway compromise on the day of surgery. Forty-nine patients (91%) underwent adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), with 11 patients requiring gastrostomy tube placement during RT. Addition of TORS to overall management of head and neck SCCA spared adjuvant RT or combined chemotherapy and RT (CRT) in 50% of stage I/II tumors and spared chemotherapy in 34% of stage III/IV tumors.

Conclusion: TORS is a safe procedure with minimal complications and favorable clinical and functional outcomes. It is a promising future alternative surgical treatment for laryngopharyngeal tumors.

Citing Articles

A Comprehensive Systematic Review on Functional Results, Speech and Swallowing Outcomes after Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer.

Guarino P, Chiari F, Cordeschi S, DAlessio P, Ingelido C, Motta G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39457989 PMC: 11509014. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206039.


Role of TORS as De-Escalation Strategy in HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer, What We Need to Know.

Molteni G, Bassani S, Arsie A, Zampieri E, Mannelli G, Orlandi E Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 38786424 PMC: 11121063. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12101014.


A prospective evaluation of postoperative swallowing function and dysphagia following endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery.

Mizuno K, Kishimoto Y, Kawai Y, Fujimura S, Iwanaga K, Mizuno K Int J Clin Oncol. 2023; 28(4):521-530.

PMID: 36780098 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02309-x.


Optimized decision support for selection of transoral robotic surgery or (chemo)radiation therapy based on posttreatment swallowing toxicity.

Hemmati M, Barbon C, Mohamed A, van Dijk L, Moreno A, Gross N Cancer Med. 2022; 12(4):5088-5098.

PMID: 36229990 PMC: 9972156. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5253.


The Sinai Robotic Surgery Trial in HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SIRS 2.0 trial) - study protocol for a phase II non-randomized non-inferiority trial.

Chai R, Ferrandino R, Barron C, Donboli K, Roof S, Khan M Front Oncol. 2022; 12:965578.

PMID: 36091121 PMC: 9453550. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.965578.


References
1.
Terrell J, Ronis D, Fowler K, Bradford C, Chepeha D, Prince M . Clinical predictors of quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130(4):401-8. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.4.401. View

2.
Kim T, Youm H, Byun H, Son Y, Baek C . Treatment Outcomes and Quality of Life in Oropharyngeal Cancer after Surgery-based versus Radiation-based Treatment. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 3(3):153-60. PMC: 2958508. DOI: 10.3342/ceo.2010.3.3.153. View

3.
van der Schroeff M, Derks W, Hordijk G, de Leeuw R . The effect of age on survival and quality of life in elderly head and neck cancer patients: a long-term prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 264(4):415-22. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0203-y. View

4.
Weinstein G, OMalley Jr B, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H . Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 133(12):1220-6. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.133.12.1220. View

5.
Funk G, Karnell L, Smith R, Christensen A . Clinical significance of health status assessment measures in head and neck cancer: what do quality-of-life scores mean?. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130(7):825-9. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.7.825. View