» Articles » PMID: 21796408

Atlas of the Muscle Motor Points for the Lower Limb: Implications for Electrical Stimulation Procedures and Electrode Positioning

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2011 Jul 29
PMID 21796408
Citations 82
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the uniformity of the muscle motor point location for lower limb muscles in healthy subjects. Fifty-three subjects of both genders (age range: 18-50 years) were recruited. The muscle motor points were identified for the following ten muscles of the lower limb (dominant side): vastus medialis, rectus femoris, and vastus lateralis of the quadriceps femoris, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus of the hamstring muscles, tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, lateral and medial gastrocnemius. The muscle motor point was identified by scanning the skin surface with a stimulation pen electrode and corresponded to the location of the skin area above the muscle in which an electrical pulse evoked a muscle twitch with the least injected current. For each investigated muscle, 0.15 ms square pulses were delivered through the pen electrode at low current amplitude (<10 mA) and frequency (2 Hz). 16 motor points were identified in the 10 investigated muscles of almost all subjects: 3 motor points for the vastus lateralis, 2 motor points for rectus femoris, vastus medialis, biceps femoris, and tibialis anterior, 1 motor point for the remaining muscles. An important inter-individual variability was observed for the position of the following 4 out of 16 motor points: vastus lateralis (proximal), biceps femoris (short head), semimembranosus, and medial gastrocnemius. Possible implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning different from those commonly applied for thigh and leg muscles are discussed.

Citing Articles

Heteronymous feedback from quadriceps onto soleus in stroke survivors.

Cuadra C, Wolf S, Lyle M J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):39.

PMID: 40011904 PMC: 11866609. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01572-5.


Comfort, consistency, and efficiency of garments with textile electrodes versus hydrogel electrodes for neuromuscular electrical stimulation in a randomized crossover trial.

Jafari E, Descollonges M, Deley G, Di Marco J, Popovic-Maneski L, Metani A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6869.

PMID: 40011562 PMC: 11865617. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91452-8.


Motorpoint Heatmap of the Hamstring Muscles to Facilitate Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

Flodin J, Amiri P, Juthberg R, Ackermann P Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(3):612-621.

PMID: 39609344 PMC: 11835891. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03657-z.


Centrally mediated responses to NMES are influenced by muscle group and stimulation parameters.

Popesco T, Gardet Q, Bossard J, Maffiuletti N, Place N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24918.

PMID: 39438501 PMC: 11496505. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75145-2.


Influence of kilohertz frequency, burst duty cycle and burst duration on evoked torque, discomfort and muscle efficiency: A randomized crossover trial.

Modesto K, Raposo P, da Silva Almeida I, Vaz M, Durigan J Physiol Rep. 2024; 12(20):e70039.

PMID: 39411829 PMC: 11480646. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.70039.


References
1.
Maffiuletti N . Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 110(2):223-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y. View

2.
Lee J, Lee B, An X, Chung R, Kwon S, Han S . Anatomic localization of motor entry point of superficial peroneal nerve to peroneus longus and brevis muscles. Clin Anat. 2011; 24(2):232-6. DOI: 10.1002/ca.21076. View

3.
Davies P, Jones P, Norgan N . The distribution of subcutaneous and internal fat in man. Ann Hum Biol. 1986; 13(2):189-92. DOI: 10.1080/03014468600008341. View

4.
Place N, Casartelli N, Glatthorn J, Maffiuletti N . Comparison of quadriceps inactivation between nerve and muscle stimulation. Muscle Nerve. 2010; 42(6):894-900. DOI: 10.1002/mus.21776. View

5.
Bax L, Staes F, Verhagen A . Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med. 2005; 35(3):191-212. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00002. View