Centrally Mediated Responses to NMES Are Influenced by Muscle Group and Stimulation Parameters

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Oct 22

PMID 39438501

Authors

Timothee Popesco

Quentin Gardet

Jonathan Bossard

Nicola A Maffiuletti

Nicolas Place

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Wide-pulse high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation (WPHF NMES) can generate a progressive increase in tetanic force through reflexive recruitment of motor units, called extra force. This phenomenon has previously been observed on different muscle groups, but little is known on potential inter-muscle differences. We compared extra force and sustained electromyographic (EMG) activity induced by NMES between plantar flexors, knee extensors, elbow flexors and within muscle groups using pulse durations of 0.2, 1 and 2 ms and stimulation frequencies of 20, 50, 100 and 147 Hz. Extra force production and sustained EMG activity were higher for plantar flexors compared to elbow flexors at all tested parameters (except 0.2 ms for extra force). When compared to elbow flexors, extra force of the knee extensors was only higher at 100 Hz and with 1 ms while sustained EMG activity was higher at all frequencies with pulse durations of 0.2 and 2 ms. Peripheral nerve architecture as well as muscle typology and function could influence the occurrence and magnitude of centrally-mediated responses to NMES. The present findings suggest that the use of wide-pulse high-frequency NMES to promote reflexive recruitment seems to be more pertinent for lower limb muscles, plantar flexors in particular.

References

Gonzalez E, Downey R, Rouse C, Dixon W . Influence of Elbow Flexion and Stimulation Site on Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Biceps Brachii. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018; 26(4):904-910. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2807762. View

Frigon A, Carroll T, Jones K, Zehr E, Collins D . Ankle position and voluntary contraction alter maximal M waves in soleus and tibialis anterior. Muscle Nerve. 2007; 35(6):756-66. PMC: 5005069. DOI: 10.1002/mus.20747. View

Gregory C, Dixon W, Bickel C . Impact of varying pulse frequency and duration on muscle torque production and fatigue. Muscle Nerve. 2007; 35(4):504-9. DOI: 10.1002/mus.20710. View

Mesquita R, Taylor J, Kirk B, Blazevich A . Involuntary sustained firing of plantar flexor motor neurones: effect of electrical stimulation parameters during tendon vibration. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021; 121(3):881-891. PMC: 7892516. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04563-7. View

Donnelly C, Stegmuller J, Blazevich A, von Roten F, Kayser B, Neyroud D . Modulation of torque evoked by wide-pulse, high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation and the potential implications for rehabilitation and training. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):6399. PMC: 7973712. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85645-0. View

Lagerquist O, Mang C, Collins D . Changes in spinal but not cortical excitability following combined electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve and voluntary plantar-flexion. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 222(1-2):41-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3194-5. View

Burke D, Kiernan M, Bostock H . Excitability of human axons. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(9):1575-85. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00595-8. View

Neyroud D, Grospretre S, Gondin J, Kayser B, Place N . Test-retest reliability of wide-pulse high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation evoked force. Muscle Nerve. 2017; 57(1):E70-E77. DOI: 10.1002/mus.25747. View

Magladery J . Some observations on spinal reflexes in man. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1955; 261(4):302-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF00364122. View

10.

Ivanenko Y, Gurfinkel V . Human Postural Control. Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:171. PMC: 5869197. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00171. View

11.

Blouin J, Walsh L, Nickolls P, Gandevia S . High-frequency submaximal stimulation over muscle evokes centrally generated forces in human upper limb skeletal muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008; 106(2):370-7. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90939.2008. View

12.

Clair-Auger J, Collins D, Dewald J . The effects of wide pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation on elbow flexion torque in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012; 123(11):2247-55. PMC: 3517189. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.024. View

13.

Baldwin E, Klakowicz P, Collins D . Wide-pulse-width, high-frequency neuromuscular stimulation: implications for functional electrical stimulation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006; 101(1):228-40. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00871.2005. View

14.

Hounsgaard J, Hultborn H, Jespersen B, Kiehn O . Bistability of alpha-motoneurones in the decerebrate cat and in the acute spinal cat after intravenous 5-hydroxytryptophan. J Physiol. 1988; 405:345-67. PMC: 1190979. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017336. View

15.

Wegrzyk J, Foure A, Vilmen C, Ghattas B, Maffiuletti N, Mattei J . Extra Forces induced by wide-pulse, high-frequency electrical stimulation: Occurrence, magnitude, variability and underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 126(7):1400-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.001. View

16.

Mang C, Lagerquist O, Collins D . Changes in corticospinal excitability evoked by common peroneal nerve stimulation depend on stimulation frequency. Exp Brain Res. 2010; 203(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2202-x. View

17.

Dean J, Yates L, Collins D . Turning on the central contribution to contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007; 103(1):170-6. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01361.2006. View

18.

Rainoldi A, Melchiorri G, Caruso I . A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 134(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.014. View

19.

Lee R, Heckman C . Bistability in spinal motoneurons in vivo: systematic variations in persistent inward currents. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80(2):583-93. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.2.583. View

20.

Trajano G, Seitz L, Nosaka K, Blazevich A . Can passive stretch inhibit motoneuron facilitation in the human plantar flexors?. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014; 117(12):1486-92. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00809.2014. View