» Articles » PMID: 21789739

Combination of Dose Escalation with Technological Advances (intensity-modulated and Image-guided Radiotherapy) is Not Associated with Increased Morbidity for Patients with Prostate Cancer

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2011 Jul 27
PMID 21789739
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to evaluate treatment-related morbidity after intensity-modulated (IMRT) and image-guided (IGRT) radiotherapy with a total dose of 76 Gy in comparison to conventional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) up to 70.2-72 Gy for patients with prostate cancer.

Patients And Methods: All patients were prospectively surveyed prior to, on the last day, as well as after a median time of 2 and 16 months after RT using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite). Criteria for the 78 matched pairs after IMRT vs. 3DCRT were patient age, use of antiandrogens, treatment volume (± whole pelvis), prognostic risk group, and urinary/bowel/sexual quality of life (QoL) before treatment.

Results: QoL changes after dose-escalated IMRT were found to be similar to QoL changes after 3DCRT in all domains. Only sexual function scores more than 1 year after RT decreased slightly more after 3DCRT in comparison to IMRT (mean 9 vs. 6 points; p = 0.04), with erections firm enough for intercourse in 14% vs. 30% (p = 0.03). Painful bowel movements were reported more frequently after 3DCRT vs. IMRT 2 months after treatment (≥ once a day in 10% vs. 1%; p = 0.03), but a tendency for higher rectal bleeding rates was found after IMRT vs. 3DCRT more than 1 year after RT (≥ rarely in 20% vs. 9%; p = 0.06).

Conclusion: Combination of dose escalation with technological advances (IMRT and IGRT) is not associated with increased morbidity for patients with prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Erectile function preservation after salvage radiation therapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy: Five-year results of the SAKK 09/10 randomized phase 3 trial.

Zwahlen D, Schroder C, Holer L, Bernhard J, Holscher T, Arnold W Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024; 47:100786.

PMID: 38706726 PMC: 11067361. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100786.


Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Trajectories after Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer-Which Patients Suffer from Persisting Problems?.

Pinkawa M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(17).

PMID: 37686572 PMC: 10486744. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174295.


Erectile dysfunction and cancer: current perspective.

Madan R, Dracham C, Khosla D, Goyal S, Yadav A Radiat Oncol J. 2020; 38(4):217-225.

PMID: 33233032 PMC: 7785841. DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00332.


Quality of life more than 10 years after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer-impact of time after treatment and prescription dose.

Pinkawa M, Gharib A, Schlenter M, Timm L, Eble M Qual Life Res. 2020; 30(2):437-443.

PMID: 33034812 PMC: 7886756. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02639-7.


Application of rectal retractor for postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy of prostate cancer: A case report and literature review.

Ghaffari H, Ardekani M, Molana S, Haghparast M, Sanei M, Mahdavi S Clin Case Rep. 2019; 7(11):2102-2107.

PMID: 31788259 PMC: 6878068. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2430.


References
1.
Michalski J, Winter K, Purdy J, Parliament M, Wong H, Perez C . Toxicity after three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406 dose Level V. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 62(3):706-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.028. View

2.
Vordermark D, Schwab M, Ness-Dourdoumas R, Sailer M, Flentje M, Koelbl O . Association of anorectal dose-volume histograms and impaired fecal continence after 3D conformal radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate. Radiother Oncol. 2003; 69(2):209-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2003.07.002. View

3.
Pinkawa M, Piroth M, Holy R, Fischedick K, Klotz J, Szekely-Orban D . Quality of life after whole pelvic versus prostate-only external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a matched-pair comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 81(1):23-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.054. View

4.
Pinkawa M, Piroth M, Fischedick K, Holy R, Klotz J, Nussen S . Impact of the target volume (prostate alone vs. prostate with seminal vesicles) and fraction dose (1.8 Gy vs. 2.0 Gy) on quality of life changes after external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2009; 185(11):724-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-009-2008-6. View

5.
Arruda Viani G, Stefano E, Afonso S . Higher-than-conventional radiation doses in localized prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74(5):1405-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.091. View