» Articles » PMID: 21784917

Role of Alcohols in Growth, Lipid Composition, and Membrane Fluidity of Yeasts, Bacteria, and Archaea

Overview
Date 2011 Jul 26
PMID 21784917
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increased membrane fluidity, which causes cofactor leakage and loss of membrane potential, has long been documented as a cause for decreased cell growth during exposure to ethanol, butanol, and other alcohols. Reinforcement of the membrane with more complex lipid components is thus thought to be beneficial for the generation of more tolerant organisms. In this study, organisms with more complex membranes, namely, archaea, did not maintain high growth rates upon exposure to alcohols, indicating that more complex lipids do not necessarily fortify the membrane against the fluidizing effects of alcohols. In the presence of alcohols, shifts in lipid composition to more saturated and unbranched lipids were observed in most of the organisms tested, including archaea, yeasts, and bacteria. However, these shifts did not always result in a decrease in membrane fluidity or in greater tolerance of the organism to alcohol exposure. In general, organisms tolerating the highest concentrations of alcohols maintained membrane fluidity after alcohol exposure, whereas organisms that increased membrane rigidity were less tolerant. Altered lipid composition was a common response to alcohol exposure, with the most tolerant organisms maintaining a modestly fluid membrane. Our results demonstrate that increased membrane fluidity is not the sole cause of growth inhibition and that alcohols may also denature proteins within the membrane and cytosol, adversely affecting metabolism and decreasing cell growth.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive network of stress-induced responses in Zymomonas mobilis during bioethanol production: from physiological and molecular responses to the effects of system metabolic engineering.

Asefi S, Nouri H, Pourmohammadi G, Moghimi H Microb Cell Fact. 2024; 23(1):180.

PMID: 38890644 PMC: 11186258. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-024-02459-1.


Another Brick in the Wall of Tear Film Insights Added Through the Total Synthesis and Biophysical Profiling of -Branched Wax and Cholesteryl Esters.

Stubb H, Viitaja T, Trevorah R, Raitanen J, Moilanen J, Svedstrom K J Nat Prod. 2024; 87(4):954-965.

PMID: 38547477 PMC: 11389978. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.3c01247.


Genome-wide identification of resistance genes and response mechanism analysis of key gene knockout strain to catechol in .

Liao H, Li Q, Chen Y, Tang J, Mou B, Lu F Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1364425.

PMID: 38450166 PMC: 10915035. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1364425.


Lipid membrane remodeling and metabolic response during isobutanol and ethanol exposure in Zymomonas mobilis.

Rivera Vazquez J, Trujillo E, Williams J, She F, Getahun F, Callaghan M Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2024; 17(1):14.

PMID: 38281959 PMC: 10823705. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-023-02450-9.


Effect of Fortified Inoculation with Indigenous on Solid-State Fermentation of Light-Flavor .

Chen X, Huang X, Sun S, Han B Foods. 2024; 12(23).

PMID: 38231663 PMC: 10706162. DOI: 10.3390/foods12234198.


References
1.
Hanford M, Peeples T . Archaeal tetraether lipids: unique structures and applications. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2002; 97(1):45-62. DOI: 10.1385/abab:97:1:45. View

2.
BLIGH E, Dyer W . A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959; 37(8):911-7. DOI: 10.1139/o59-099. View

3.
Liu S, Qureshi N . How microbes tolerate ethanol and butanol. N Biotechnol. 2009; 26(3-4):117-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2009.06.984. View

4.
Harris V, Ford C, Jiranek V, Grbin P . Dekkera and Brettanomyces growth and utilisation of hydroxycinnamic acids in synthetic media. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 78(6):997-1006. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1328-7. View

5.
Gonzalez R, Tao H, Purvis J, York S, Shanmugam K, Ingram L . Gene array-based identification of changes that contribute to ethanol tolerance in ethanologenic Escherichia coli: comparison of KO11 (parent) to LY01 (resistant mutant). Biotechnol Prog. 2003; 19(2):612-23. DOI: 10.1021/bp025658q. View