» Articles » PMID: 20334903

Serum Biomarker Panels for the Discrimination of Benign from Malignant Cases in Patients with an Adnexal Mass

Overview
Journal Gynecol Oncol
Date 2010 Mar 26
PMID 20334903
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The diagnosis of an adnexal mass is a prevalent issue among women in the United States, although current methods of identifying those at high risk of malignancy remain insufficient. Ineffective triage of women with malignant masses is associated with delayed or inappropriate treatment and a negative effect on disease outcome.

Methods: We performed an evaluation of 65 ovarian cancer-related biomarkers in the circulation of women diagnosed with an adnexal mass. Our subject group consisted of women diagnosed with benign masses and early- and late-stage ovarian cancer.

Results: More than half of the biomarkers tested were found to differ significantly between benign and malignant cases. As individual markers, HE4 and CA-125 provided the greatest level of discrimination between benign and malignant cases, and the combination of these two biomarkers provided a higher level of discriminatory power than either marker considered alone. Multivariate statistical analysis identified several multimarker panels that could discriminate early-stage, late-stage, and combined ovarian cancers from benign cases with similar or slightly improved SN/SP levels to the CA-125/HE4 combination; however, these larger panels could not outperform the 2-biomarker panel in an independent validation set. We also identified a 3-biomarker panel with particular utility in premenopausal women.

Conclusions: Our findings serve to advance the development of blood-based screening methods for the discrimination of benign and malignant ovarian masses by confirming and expanding upon the superior utility of the CA-125/HE4 combination.

Citing Articles

Ovarian Cancer surgical consideration is markedly improved by the neural network powered-MIA3G multivariate index assay.

Roy Choudhury M, Pappas T, Twiggs L, Caoili E, Fritsche H, Phan R Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1374836.

PMID: 38756943 PMC: 11097110. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1374836.


Sensitivity and Specificity of Selected Biomarkers and Their Combinations in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.

Englisz A, Smycz-Kubanska M, Mielczarek-Palacz A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38732363 PMC: 11083226. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090949.


HE4 and CA-125 kinetics to predict outcome in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: the META4 clinical trial.

Fabbro M, Lamy P, Touraine C, Floquet A, Ray-Coquard I, Mollevi C Front Oncol. 2024; 13:1308630.

PMID: 38273857 PMC: 10808592. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1308630.


Mass spectrometry-based proteomics as an emerging tool in clinical laboratories.

Birhanu A Clin Proteomics. 2023; 20(1):32.

PMID: 37633929 PMC: 10464495. DOI: 10.1186/s12014-023-09424-x.


Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of HE4 with CA125 and validation of the ROMA index in differentiating malignant and benign epithelial ovarian tumours among patients in Lagos, Nigeria.

Shittu K, Rabiu K, Akinola O, Ahmed S, Adewunmi A Ecancermedicalscience. 2023; 17:1568.

PMID: 37533954 PMC: 10393307. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1568.


References
1.
van Nagell Jr J, DePriest P, Ueland F, DeSimone C, Cooper A, McDonald J . Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened. Cancer. 2007; 109(9):1887-96. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22594. View

2.
Bristow R, Tomacruz R, Armstrong D, Trimble E, Montz F . Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(5):1248-59. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248. View

3.
Stany M, Hamilton C . Benign disorders of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008; 35(2):271-84, ix. DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.03.004. View

4.
Yurkovetsky Z, Skates S, Lomakin A, Nolen B, Pulsipher T, Modugno F . Development of a multimarker assay for early detection of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(13):2159-66. PMC: 2860434. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2484. View

5.
Levina V, Nolen B, Marrangoni A, Cheng P, Marks J, Szczepanski M . Role of eotaxin-1 signaling in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15(8):2647-56. PMC: 2669845. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2024. View