» Articles » PMID: 21754934

Sealing Capability and SEM Observation of the Implant-Abutment Interface

Overview
Journal Int J Dent
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2011 Jul 15
PMID 21754934
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To evaluate the sealing capability of external hexagon implant systems and assess the marginal fit, two groups (n = 10 each) were employed: SIN (Sistema de Implantes Nacional, Brazil) and Osseotite, (Biomet 3i, USA). Sealing capability was determined by placing 0.7 μL of 1% acid-red solution in the implant wells before the torque of their respective abutments. Specimens were then placed into 2.5 mL vials filled with 1.3 mL of distilled water with the implant-abutment interface submerged. Three samples of 100 μL water were collected at previously determinate times. The absorbance was measured with a spectrophotometer, and the data were analyzed by Two-way ANOVA (P < .05) and Tukey's test. Marginal fit was determined using SEM. Leakage was observed for both groups at all times and was significantly higher at 144 hrs. SEM analysis depicted gaps in the implant-abutment interface of both groups. Gaps in the implant-abutment interface were observed along with leakage increased at the 144 hrs evaluation period.

Citing Articles

Effect of Cyclic Loading on the Fixture-Abutment Microgap in Short Implants Versus Standard Implants: An In Vitro Study.

Esfahanizadeh G, Jalalian E, Salehi S, Ghasemi M, Golalipour S Int J Dent. 2025; 2024:4723112.

PMID: 39759840 PMC: 11698602. DOI: 10.1155/ijod/4723112.


Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant-Abutment Connection.

Kowalski J, Puszkarz A, Radwanski M, Sokolowski J, Cichomski M, Bourgi R Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(12).

PMID: 37374674 PMC: 10305145. DOI: 10.3390/ma16124491.


Microgap and microleakage of a hybrid connection platform-switched implant system in the absence or presence of a silicone-based sealing agent.

Fernandes P, Grenho L, Fernandes M, Sampaio-Fernandes J, Gomes P Odontology. 2021; 110(2):231-239.

PMID: 34448952 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-021-00652-x.

References
1.
Duarte A, Rossetti P, Rossetti L, Torres S, Bonachela W . In vitro sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces. J Periodontol. 2006; 77(11):1828-32. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060101. View

2.
Prosper L, Redaelli S, Pasi M, Zarone F, Radaelli G, Gherlone E . A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(2):299-308. View

3.
Binon P, McHugh M . The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont. 1996; 9(6):511-9. View

4.
Bahat O . Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15(5):646-53. View

5.
Jansen V, Conrads G, Richter E . Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12(4):527-40. View