» Articles » PMID: 17076607

In Vitro Sealing Ability of Two Materials at Five Different Implant-abutment Surfaces

Overview
Journal J Periodontol
Date 2006 Nov 2
PMID 17076607
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to test the sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces.

Methods: In the first phase, 2 mul brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth was deposited into the implant wells and glass culture tubes. A varnish or silicon sealant was applied at the cervical implant portion of experimental groups. The control group remained unexposed. The abutments were torque-tightened to 20 Ncm with a manual torque driver. Implants were immersed in 4 ml BHI broth at 37 degrees C for 2 hours to exclude contamination. In the second phase, 100 mul Enterococcus faecalis American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strain 29212 was deposited into the glass culture tubes. After periods of 7, 14, 21, 35, 49, and 63 days, the sealing capacity was checked. Abutments were removed, and a sterile paper cone collected material inside implant bodies. This material was transferred to new tubes with BHI to verify the presence of cloudy broths within 24 to 48 hours.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two materials for each time period (Fisher exact test; P >0.05). Group E showed the least level of sealing ability (six implants contaminated), whereas group T showed the highest level (only two implants).

Conclusions: 1) Materials tested were not able to prevent contamination over 63 days. 2) Bacterial contamination was verified after 14 and 35 days in the control and experimental groups, respectively. 3) Although materials tested had demonstrated similar sealing capacities, dental implants showed bacterial contamination regardless of their external or internal hexagonal configurations.

Citing Articles

Factors Influencing the Screw Stability of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: An In Vitro Study.

Bishti S, Alsagher M, Homa M, Wolfart S, Tuna T Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(3).

PMID: 39942172 PMC: 11818324. DOI: 10.3390/ma18030506.


Microleakage along the implant-abutment interface: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

Mao Z, Beuer F, Wu D, Zhu Q, Yassine J, Schwitalla A Int J Implant Dent. 2023; 9(1):34.

PMID: 37733145 PMC: 10514016. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00494-y.


Evaluation of customized cobalt-chromium abutments fabricated with different manufacturing process versus titanium stock abutments on the marginal misfit -An study.

Sutradhar W, Mishra S, Chowdhary R J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022; 22(3):225-232.

PMID: 36511051 PMC: 9416951. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_381_21.


Sealing Efficacy of the Original and Third-Party Custom-Made Abutments-Microbiological In Vitro Pilot Study.

Smojver I, Bjelica R, Catic A, Budimir A, Vuletic M, Gabric D Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(4).

PMID: 35208136 PMC: 8879410. DOI: 10.3390/ma15041597.


Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy and Permeability of Various Sealing Materials at the Implant-Abutment Interface-A Pilot In Vitro Study.

Smojver I, Vuletic M, Gerbl D, Budimir A, Susic M, Gabric D Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(2).

PMID: 33466846 PMC: 7830056. DOI: 10.3390/ma14020385.