» Articles » PMID: 21722154

Impact of Dental Implant Length on Early Failure Rates: a Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

Overview
Date 2011 Jul 5
PMID 21722154
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To test the null hypothesis of no difference in failure rates of short (minimum length: 7 mm) and longer dental implants (≥ 10 mm), a meta-analysis was performed on prospective observational trials.

Materials And Methods: A systematic electronic and hand search was performed to identify eligible studies. Having additional data supplied by the authors, 54 publications were included (19,083 implants).

Results: In case of mandibular implants, the null hypothesis of no impact of reduced implant length on failure within the first year of prosthetic loading could not be rejected. A significant impact of implant length could be substantiated for short machined implants in the anterior [odds ratio (OR) 5.4] and posterior maxilla (OR 3.4), while short rough-surfaced implants demonstrated increased failure rates in the anterior maxillary sites. No influence of implant diameter and denture type on the failure rate of short implants could be revealed.

Conclusion: In areas of reduced alveolar bone height the use of short dental implants may reduce the need for invasive bone augmentation procedures.

Citing Articles

Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medikeri R, Pereira M, Waingade M, Navale S J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022; 52(4):261-281.

PMID: 36047581 PMC: 9436640. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2007340367.


Development of a new preclinical model to study early implant loss: a validation study in the beagle dog.

Linares A, Verdeja R, Pippenger B, Munoz F, Lopez-Pena M, Blanco J Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26(11):6805-6815.

PMID: 35882681 PMC: 9643266. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04642-3.


Short versus Longer Implants in Sites without the Need for Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Guida L, Bressan E, Cecoro G, Volpe A, Fabbro M, Annunziata M Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(9).

PMID: 35591482 PMC: 9099984. DOI: 10.3390/ma15093138.


Survival rates of ultra-short (<6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: A 5-year retrospective study.

Lombardo G, Signoriello A, Marincola M, Liboni P, Bonfante E, Nocini P Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021; 23(6):904-919.

PMID: 34796619 PMC: 9299664. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13054.


Two short implants versus one short implant with a cantilever: 5-Year results of a randomized clinical trial.

Thoma D, Wolleb K, Schellenberg R, Strauss F, Hammerle C, Jung R J Clin Periodontol. 2021; 48(11):1480-1490.

PMID: 34448219 PMC: 9292666. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13541.