» Articles » PMID: 21710112

Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Knee Function Associated with Double Femoral Pin Fixation and Fixation with Interference Screw in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2011 Jun 29
PMID 21710112
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Intensive scheduling in sports requires athletes to resume physical activity shortly after injury. The purpose of this study was to investigate early isokinetic muscle strength and knee function on bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction with double femoral pin fixation or interference screw technique.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted from 2008 to 2009, with 48 athletes who received femoral BPTB fixation with interference screw (n = 26) or double pin (n = 22). Clinical (IKDC objective score and hop test) and isokinetic muscle strength (peak torque (PT), PT/body weight and flexion/extension rate (F/E) in 60 and 240°/s) were analyzed at 6 months of follow-up.

Results: Analysis at baseline showed no differences between groups before surgery related to age, gender, associated injury, Tegner or Lysholm score; thus showing that groups were similar. During follow-up, however, there were significant differences between the two groups in some of the isokinetic muscle strength: PT/BW 60°/s (Double Pin = 200% ± 13% vs. Interference Screw = 253% ± 16%*, *P = 0.01); F/E 60°/s (Double Pin = 89% ± 29%* vs. Interference Screw = 74% ± 12%, *P = 0.04). No statistical differences between groups were observed on IKDC objective score, hop test and complications.

Conclusion: The significant muscle strength outcome of the interference screw group found in this study gives initial evidence that this fixation technique is useful for athletes that may need accelerated rehabilitation. Early return to sports ability signaled by isokinetic muscle strength is of clinical relevance as it is one of the main goals for athletes' rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Speed, not magnitude, of knee extensor torque production is associated with self-reported knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Hsieh C, Indelicato P, Moser M, Vandenborne K, Chmielewski T Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 23(11):3214-20.

PMID: 25026933 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3168-1.


Isokinetic evaluation after two-stage bicruciate reconstruction.

Gigliotakaes I, Inada M, de Miranda J, Cunha S, Piedade S Acta Ortop Bras. 2014; 22(1):21-4.

PMID: 24644415 PMC: 3952866. DOI: 10.1590/S1413-78522014000100003.


The influence of femoral tunnel position in single-bundle ACL reconstruction on functional outcomes and return to sports.

Fernandes T, Fregni F, Weaver K, Pedrinelli A, Camanho G, Hernandez A Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 22(1):97-103.

PMID: 23132410 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2288-8.

References
1.
Fitzgerald G, Axe M, Snyder-Mackler L . A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000; 8(2):76-82. DOI: 10.1007/s001670050190. View

2.
Augustsson J, Thomee R, Karlsson J . Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004; 12(5):350-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0518-4. View

3.
Corsetti J, Jackson D . Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the biologic basis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (325):42-9. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199604000-00006. View

4.
Lautamies R, Harilainen A, Kettunen J, Sandelin J, Kujala U . Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and knee function 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16(11):1009-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0598-7. View

5.
. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organ. 2001; 79(4):373-4. PMC: 2566407. View