» Articles » PMID: 19760398

The Relationship of Lateral Anatomic Structures to Exiting Guide Pins During Femoral Tunnel Preparation Utilizing an Accessory Medial Portal

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2009 Sep 18
PMID 19760398
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament through an accessory medial portal has become increasingly popular. The purpose of this study is to describe the relationship of guide pin exit points to the lateral anatomic structures when preparing the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel through an accessory medial portal. We utilized seven fresh frozen cadaveric knees. Utilizing an anteromedial approach, a guide wire was placed into the center of each bundle's footprint. Each guide wire was advanced through the lateral femoral cortex. The guide pins were passed at 90, 110, and 130 degrees of knee flexion. The distances from each guide pin to the closest relevant structures on the lateral side of the knee were measured. At 90 degrees the posterolateral bundle guide pin was closest to the lateral condyle articular cartilage (mean 5.4 +/- 2.2 mm) and gastrocnemius tendon (mean 5.7 +/- 2.1 mm). At 110 degrees the posterolateral bundle pin was closest to the gastrocnemius tendon (mean 4.5 +/- 3.4 mm). At 130 degrees the posterolateral bundle pin was closest to the gastrocnemius tendon (mean 7.2 +/- 5.5 mm) and lateral collateral ligament (mean 6.8 +/- 2.1 mm). At 90 degrees the anteromedial bundle guide pin was closest to the articular cartilage (mean 2.0 +/- 2.0 mm). At 110 degrees the anteromedial bundle pin was closest to the articular cartilage (mean 7.4 +/- 3.5 mm) and gastrocnemius tendon (mean 12.3 +/- 3.1 mm). At 130 degrees the AM bundle pin was closest to the gastrocnemius tendon (mean 8.2 +/- 3.2 mm) and LCL (mean 15.1 +/- 2.9 mm). Neither guide pin (anteromedial or posterolateral bundle) put the peroneal nerve at risk at any knee flexion angle. At low knee flexion angles the anteromedial and posterolateral bundle guide pins closely approximated multiple lateral structures when using an accessory medial arthroscopic portal. Utilizing higher flexion angles increases the margin of error when preparing both femoral tunnels. During preparation of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel through an accessory anteromedial portal the tunnels should be drilled in at least 110 degrees of knee flexion in order to move guide pin exit points away from important lateral knee structures.

Citing Articles

Progress in research on and classification of surgical methods of arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL and ALL using a shared tendon graft through the femoral tunnel.

Guo Z, Liu F Front Surg. 2024; 10:1292530.

PMID: 38186395 PMC: 10766812. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1292530.


Effect of Tunnel Drilling Portal on Femoral Tunnel Entry Aperture's Location in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Ghaffar A, Arora R, Agrawal A, Kumar A, Maheshwari R Cureus. 2022; 14(2):e21948.

PMID: 35273889 PMC: 8902374. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21948.


The Relationship Between Lateral Femoral Anatomic Structures and the Femoral Tunnel Outlet in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Transportal Technique: A 3-Dimensional Simulation Analysis.

Chung K, Choi C, Kim S, Kim S, Do W, Jung M Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8(9):2325967120952783.

PMID: 33062766 PMC: 7536382. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120952783.


CORR Insights®: Does Knee Flexion Influence the Relationship between the Femoral Tunnel and the Lateral Anatomic Structures During ACL Reconstruction?.

Fu F Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477(10):2240-2242.

PMID: 31389884 PMC: 6999928. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000894.


Does Knee Flexion Influence the Relationship between the Femoral Tunnel and the Lateral Anatomic Structures During ACL Reconstruction?.

Chung K, Kim S, Choi C, Kim S, Choi Y, Jung M Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477(10):2228-2239.

PMID: 31169629 PMC: 6999939. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000845.


References
1.
Loh J, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman R, Fu F, Woo S . Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(3):297-304. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2003.50084. View

2.
Farrow L, Chen M, Cooperman D, Victoroff B, Goodfellow D . Morphology of the femoral intercondylar notch. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(10):2150-5. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01191. View

3.
Lubowitz J . Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy. 2008; 25(1):95-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.10.012. View

4.
Meredick R, Vance K, Appleby D, Lubowitz J . Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36(7):1414-21. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508317964. View

5.
Sohn D, Garrett Jr W . Transitioning to anatomic anterior cruciate ligament graft placement. J Knee Surg. 2009; 22(2):155-60. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247743. View