» Articles » PMID: 21708998

Protective Efficacy and Safety of Brucella Melitensis 16MΔmucR Against Intraperitoneal and Aerosol Challenge in BALB/c Mice

Overview
Journal Infect Immun
Date 2011 Jun 29
PMID 21708998
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brucellosis is a zoonosis of nearly worldwide distribution. Vaccination against this pathogen is an important control strategy to prevent the disease. Currently licensed vaccine strains used in animals are unacceptable for human use due to undesirable side effects and modest protection. Substantial progress has been made during the past 10 years toward the development of improved vaccines for brucellosis. In part, this has been achieved by the identification and characterization of live attenuated mutants that are safer in the host but still can stimulate an adequate immune response. In the present study, the identification and characterization of the mucR mutant (BMEI 1364) as a vaccine candidate for brucellosis was conducted. BALB/c mice were vaccinated intraperitoneally at a dose of 10(5) CFU with the mutant to evaluate safety and protective efficacy against intraperitoneal and aerosol challenge. All animals vaccinated with the vaccine candidate demonstrated a statistically significant degree of protection against both intraperitoneal and aerosol challenge. Safety was revealed by the absence of Brucella associated pathological changes, including splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or granulomatous disease. These results suggest that the 16MΔmucR vaccine is safe, elicits a strong protective immunity, and should be considered as a promising vaccine candidate for human use.

Citing Articles

MucR protein: Three decades of studies have led to the identification of a new H-NS-like protein.

Baglivo I, Malgieri G, Roop 2nd R, Barton I, Wang X, Russo V Mol Microbiol. 2024; 123(2):154-167.

PMID: 38619026 PMC: 11473720. DOI: 10.1111/mmi.15261.


.

Yang J, Wang Y, Hou Y, Sun M, Xia T, Wu X Cell Insight. 2024; 3(1):100143.

PMID: 38250017 PMC: 10797155. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellin.2023.100143.


Evaluation of Brucellosis Vaccines: A Comprehensive Review.

Heidary M, Dashtbin S, Ghanavati R, Mahdizade Ari M, Bostanghadiri N, Darbandi A Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:925773.

PMID: 35923818 PMC: 9339783. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.925773.


The Transcriptional Regulator MucR, but Not Its Controlled Acid-Activated Chaperone HdeA, Is Essential for Virulence and Modulates Surface Architecture and Properties in PA.

Tartilan-Choya B, Sidhu-Munoz R, Vizcaino N Front Vet Sci. 2022; 8:814752.

PMID: 35174240 PMC: 8843074. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.814752.


Deletion of the Transcriptional Regulator MucR in Affects Stress Responses and Bacterial Virulence.

Sun J, Dong H, Peng X, Liu Y, Jiang H, Feng Y Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:650942.

PMID: 34250056 PMC: 8267065. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.650942.


References
1.
Costerton J, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell D, Korber D, Lappin-Scott H . Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995; 49:711-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431. View

2.
SPINK W, Hall 3rd J, FINSTAD J, Mallet E . Immunization with viable Brucella organisms. Results of a safety test in humans. Bull World Health Organ. 1962; 26:409-19. PMC: 2555657. View

3.
Rinaudi L, Sorroche F, Zorreguieta A, Giordano W . Analysis of the mucR gene regulating biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides: implications for biofilm formation in Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm1021. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009; 302(1):15-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01826.x. View

4.
Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E . Brucellosis. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(22):2325-36. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra050570. View

5.
Guihot A, Bossi P, Bricaire F . [Bioterrorism with brucellosis]. Presse Med. 2004; 33(2):119-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0755-4982(04)98500-4. View