» Articles » PMID: 21685943

A Mouse Model of Heterogeneous, C-MYC-initiated Prostate Cancer with Loss of Pten and P53

Overview
Journal Oncogene
Date 2011 Jun 21
PMID 21685943
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human tumors are heterogeneous and evolve through a dynamic process of genetic mutation and selection. During this process, the effects of a specific mutation on the incipient cancer cell may dictate the nature of subsequent mutations that can be tolerated or selected for, affecting the rate at which subsequent mutations occur. Here we have used a new mouse model of prostate cancer that recapitulates several salient features of the human disease to examine the relative rates in which the remaining wild-type alleles of Pten and p53 tumor suppressor genes are lost. In this model, focal overexpression of c-MYC in a few prostate luminal epithelial cells provokes a mild proliferative response. In the context of compound Pten/p53 heterozygosity, c-MYC-initiated cells progress to prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (mPIN) and adenocarcinoma lesions with marked heterogeneity within the same prostate glands. Using laser capture microdissection and gene copy number analyses, we found that the frequency of Pten loss was significantly higher than that of p53 loss in mPIN but not invasive carcinoma lesions. c-MYC overexpression, unlike Pten loss, did not activate the p53 pathway in transgenic mouse prostate cells, explaining the lack of selective pressure to lose p53 in the c-MYC-overexpressing cells. This model of heterogeneous prostate cancer based on alterations in genes relevant to the human disease may be useful for understanding pathogenesis of the disease and testing new therapeutic agents.

Citing Articles

Castration-resistant prostate cancer is resensitized to androgen deprivation by autophagy-dependent apoptosis induced by blocking SKP2.

Celada S, Li G, Celada L, Kanagasabai T, Lu W, Brown L Sci Signal. 2024; 17(867):eadk4122.

PMID: 39689183 PMC: 11784317. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.adk4122.


Prostate Cancer: A Review of Genetics, Current Biomarkers and Personalised Treatments.

Wilson T, Zishiri O Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024; 7(10):e70016.

PMID: 39410867 PMC: 11480670. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.70016.


Diverse landscape of genetically engineered mouse models: Genomic and molecular insights into prostate cancer.

Kaushal J, Takkar S, Batra S, Siddiqui J Cancer Lett. 2024; 593:216954.

PMID: 38735382 PMC: 11799897. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216954.


Characterization of stage-specific tumor progression in TMPRSS2-ERG (fusion)-driven and non-fusion-driven prostate cancer in GEM models.

Raina K, Kant R, Prasad R, Kandhari K, Tomar M, Mishra N Mol Carcinog. 2022; 61(7):717-734.

PMID: 35452553 PMC: 10007524. DOI: 10.1002/mc.23413.


Use of RNA-Seq and a Transgenic Mouse Model to Identify Genes Which May Contribute to Mutant p53-Driven Prostate Cancer Initiation.

Vinall R, Chen Q, Talbott G, Ramsamooj R, Dang A, Tepper C Biology (Basel). 2022; 11(2).

PMID: 35205085 PMC: 8869245. DOI: 10.3390/biology11020218.


References
1.
Taylor B, Schultz N, Hieronymus H, Gopalan A, Xiao Y, Carver B . Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2010; 18(1):11-22. PMC: 3198787. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.05.026. View

2.
Konishi N, Hiasa Y, Hayashi I, Matsuda H, Tsuzuki T, Ming T . p53 mutations occur in clinical, but not latent, human prostate carcinoma. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1995; 86(1):57-63. PMC: 5920585. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb02988.x. View

3.
Mirchandani D, Zheng J, Miller G, Ghosh A, Shibata D, Cote R . Heterogeneity in intratumor distribution of p53 mutations in human prostate cancer. Am J Pathol. 1995; 147(1):92-101. PMC: 1869872. View

4.
Feilotter H, Nagai M, Boag A, Eng C, Mulligan L . Analysis of PTEN and the 10q23 region in primary prostate carcinomas. Oncogene. 1998; 16(13):1743-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1200205. View

5.
Greene D, Wheeler T, Egawa S, Weaver R, Scardino P . Relationship between clinical stage and histological zone of origin in early prostate cancer: morphometric analysis. Br J Urol. 1991; 68(5):499-509. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15394.x. View