» Articles » PMID: 21674697

Temporally Remote Destabilization of Prediction After Rare Breaches of Expectancy

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Jun 16
PMID 21674697
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While neural signatures of breaches of expectancy and their immediate effects have been investigated, thus far, temporally more remote effects have been neglected. The present fMRI study explored neural correlates of temporally remote destabilization of prediction following rare breaches of expectancy with a mean delay of 14 s. We hypothesized temporally remote destabilization to be reflected either in an attenuation of areas related to long-term memory or in an increase of lateral fronto-parietal loops related to the encoding of new stimuli. Monitoring a deterministic 24-digit sequence, subjects were asked to indicate occasional sequential omissions by key press. Temporally remote destabilization of prediction was expected to be revealed by contrasting sequential events whose equivalent was omitted in the preceding sequential run n-1 (destabilized events) with sequential events without such history (nondestabilized events). Temporally remote destabilization of prediction was reflected in an attenuation of activity in the dorsal frontomedian cortex (Brodmann Area (BA) 9) bilaterally. Moreover, activation of the left medial BA 9 was enhanced by contrasting nondestabilized events with breaches. The decrease of dorsal frontomedian activation in the case of destabilized events might be interpreted as a top-down modulation on perception causing a less expectation-restricted encoding of the current stimulus and hence enabling the adaptation of expectation and prediction in the long run.

Citing Articles

The significance of structural rich club hubs for the processing of hierarchical stimuli.

Mecklenbrauck F, Gruber M, Siestrup S, Zahedi A, Grotegerd D, Mauritz M Hum Brain Mapp. 2023; 45(4):e26543.

PMID: 38069537 PMC: 10915744. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26543.


Exploitation of local and global information in predictive processing.

Kluger D, Broers N, Roehe M, Wurm M, Busch N, Schubotz R PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231021.

PMID: 32282823 PMC: 7153873. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231021.


Being right matters: Model-compliant events in predictive processing.

Kluger D, Quante L, Kohler A, Schubotz R PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0218311.

PMID: 31194829 PMC: 6565358. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218311.


Action observers implicitly expect actors to act goal-coherently, even if they do not: an fMRI study.

Hrkac M, Wurm M, Schubotz R Hum Brain Mapp. 2013; 35(5):2178-90.

PMID: 23983202 PMC: 6869124. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22319.

References
1.
Wolpert D, Kawato M . Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 2003; 11(7-8):1317-29. DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(98)00066-5. View

2.
Wolpert D, Miall R . Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Netw. 1996; 9(8):1265-1279. DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4. View

3.
Fortin N, Agster K, Eichenbaum H . Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(5):458-62. PMC: 4053170. DOI: 10.1038/nn834. View

4.
Bubic A, Bendixen A, Schubotz R, Jacobsen T, Schroger E . Differences in processing violations of sequential and feature regularities as revealed by visual event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 2010; 1317:192-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.072. View

5.
Ferstl E, Rinck M, von Cramon D . Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(5):724-39. DOI: 10.1162/0898929053747658. View