» Articles » PMID: 18199460

Monitoring in Language Perception: Evidence from ERPs in a Picture-sentence Matching Task

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2008 Jan 18
PMID 18199460
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

P600 effects have been observed after syntactic ambiguous sentences, after several types of syntactic and semantic anomalies and after orthographic anomalies. On the basis of these findings, several investigators propose the P600 effect to reflect syntactic repair or syntactic restructuring. According to our Monitoring Theory the P600 effect reflects more general sentence reanalysis, to check whether the input sentence has been perceived appropriately. When the brain encounters a highly unexpected linguistic event, a conflict arises between the expected representation and the representation derived from the input. This conflict is proposed to trigger a process of reanalysis. In the present study, expectancy was manipulated by varying the truth-value of a sentence in relation to a picture. ERPs were recorded from 27 electrodes while we presented participants (N=30) pictures of spatial arrays followed by a sentence giving a correct or incorrect description of the picture. The mismatches were predicted to create a conflict between the conceptual representation on the basis of the picture and the actual sentence and should therefore lead to a P600. A P600 effect was indeed observed after both intra-dimensional square triangle--'the triangle stands in front of the square.', and extra-dimensional square triangle--'the triangle stands below the square.' mismatches. The present results support our Monitoring Theory; that is, the function of reprocessing reflected by the P600 effect is not purely syntactic repair or restructuring but is more general in nature, to check for possible processing errors.

Citing Articles

Neurophysiological Evidence for Semantic Processing of Irrelevant Speech and Own-Name Detection in a Virtual Café.

Brown A, Pinto D, Burgart K, Zvilichovsky Y, Zion-Golumbic E J Neurosci. 2023; 43(27):5045-5056.

PMID: 37336758 PMC: 10324990. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1731-22.2023.


Context effects in language comprehension: The role of emotional state and attention on semantic and syntactic processing.

Chwilla D Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:1014547.

PMID: 36504628 PMC: 9732474. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1014547.


Online Processing of Temporal Agreement in a Grammatical Tone Language: An ERP Study.

Tsiwah F, Bastiaanse R, van Rij J, Popov S Front Psychol. 2021; 12:638716.

PMID: 34093320 PMC: 8176019. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.638716.


The probability of object-scene co-occurrence influences object identification processes.

Sauve G, Harmand M, Vanni L, Brodeur M Exp Brain Res. 2017; 235(7):2167-2179.

PMID: 28432384 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4955-y.


About Edible Restaurants: Conflicts between Syntax and Semantics as Revealed by ERPs.

Kos M, Vosse T, van den Brink D, Hagoort P Front Psychol. 2011; 1:222.

PMID: 21833277 PMC: 3153827. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00222.