» Articles » PMID: 21669859

Sandwich Masking Eliminates Both Visual Awareness of Faces and Face-specific Brain Activity Through a Feedforward Mechanism

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2011 Jun 15
PMID 21669859
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is generally agreed that considerable amounts of low-level sensory processing of visual stimuli can occur without conscious awareness. On the other hand, the degree of higher level visual processing that occurs in the absence of awareness is as yet unclear. Here, event-related potential (ERP) measures of brain activity were recorded during a sandwich-masking paradigm, a commonly used approach for attenuating conscious awareness of visual stimulus content. In particular, the present study used a combination of ERP activation contrasts to track both early sensory-processing ERP components and face-specific N170 ERP activations, in trials with versus without awareness. The electrophysiological measures revealed that the sandwich masking abolished the early face-specific N170 neural response (peaking at ~170 ms post-stimulus), an effect that paralleled the abolition of awareness of face versus non-face image content. Furthermore, however, the masking appeared to render a strong attenuation of earlier feedforward visual sensory-processing signals. This early attenuation presumably resulted in insufficient information being fed into the higher level visual system pathways specific to object category processing, thus leading to unawareness of the visual object content. These results support a coupling of visual awareness and neural indices of face processing, while also demonstrating an early low-level mechanism of interference in sandwich masking.

Citing Articles

Neural signatures of visual awareness independent of postperceptual processing.

Cohen M, Dembski C, Ortego K, Steinhibler C, Pitts M Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(11).

PMID: 39535504 PMC: 11558846. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae415.


Measuring attentional selection of object categories using hierarchical frequency tagging.

Gagsch F, Valuch C, Albrecht T J Vis. 2024; 24(7):8.

PMID: 38990066 PMC: 11246098. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.7.8.


Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict action control when facing emotional stimuli.

Quettier T, Ippolito G, Pero L, Cardellicchio P, Battaglia S, Borgomaneri S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1391723.

PMID: 38933575 PMC: 11199899. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391723.


Faces under continuous flash suppression capture attention faster than objects, but without a face-evoked steady-state visual potential: Is curvilinearity responsible for the behavioral effect?.

Engell A, Quillian H J Vis. 2024; 20(6):14.

PMID: 38755795 PMC: 7416886. DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.6.14.


Toward viewing behavior for aerial scene categorization.

Jiang C, Chen Z, Wolfe J Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024; 9(1):17.

PMID: 38530617 PMC: 10965882. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-024-00541-1.


References
1.
Wiens S . Subliminal emotion perception in brain imaging: findings, issues, and recommendations. Prog Brain Res. 2006; 156:105-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56006-6. View

2.
Clark V, Hillyard S . Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 8(5):387-402. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.5.387. View

3.
Trenner M, Schweinberger S, Jentzsch I, Sommer W . Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 21(3):388-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.017. View

4.
Pessoa L . To what extent are emotional visual stimuli processed without attention and awareness?. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005; 15(2):188-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.002. View

5.
Morris J, Pelphrey K, McCarthy G . Face processing without awareness in the right fusiform gyrus. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(13):3087-91. PMC: 3514457. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.020. View