» Articles » PMID: 23281780

Early Visual Responses Predict Conscious Face Perception Within and Between Subjects During Binocular Rivalry

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Jan 4
PMID 23281780
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies indicate that conscious face perception may be related to neural activity in a large time window around 170-800 msec after stimulus presentation, yet in the majority of these studies changes in conscious experience are confounded with changes in physical stimulation. Using multivariate classification on MEG data recorded when participants reported changes in conscious perception evoked by binocular rivalry between a face and a grating, we showed that only MEG signals in the 120-320 msec time range, peaking at the M170 around 180 msec and the P2m at around 260 msec, reliably predicted conscious experience. Conscious perception could not only be decoded significantly better than chance from the sensors that showed the largest average difference, as previous studies suggest, but also from patterns of activity across groups of occipital sensors that individually were unable to predict perception better than chance. In addition, source space analyses showed that sources in the early and late visual system predicted conscious perception more accurately than frontal and parietal sites, although conscious perception could also be decoded there. Finally, the patterns of neural activity associated with conscious face perception generalized from one participant to another around the times of maximum prediction accuracy. Our work thus demonstrates that the neural correlates of particular conscious contents (here, faces) are highly consistent in time and space within individuals and that these correlates are shared to some extent between individuals.

Citing Articles

Neural signatures of visual awareness independent of postperceptual processing.

Cohen M, Dembski C, Ortego K, Steinhibler C, Pitts M Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(11).

PMID: 39535504 PMC: 11558846. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae415.


Tracking rivalry with neural rhythms: multivariate SSVEPs reveal perception during binocular rivalry.

Laukkonen R, Lewis-Healey E, Ghigliotti L, Daneshtalab N, Lageman J, Slagter H Neurosci Conscious. 2024; 2024(1):niae028.

PMID: 38912291 PMC: 11192868. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niae028.


Identifying content-invariant neural signatures of perceptual vividness.

Barnett B, Andersen L, Fleming S, Dijkstra N PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(2):pgae061.

PMID: 38415219 PMC: 10898512. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae061.


Binocular rivalry in autistic and socially anxious adults.

Kamhout S, Olivier J, Morris J, Brimhall H, Black B, Gabrielsen T Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1181797.

PMID: 37547197 PMC: 10400451. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1181797.


Frequency-specific neural signatures of perceptual content and perceptual stability.

Hardstone R, Flounders M, Zhu M, He B Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36125242 PMC: 9550226. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78108.


References
1.
Engell A, McCarthy G . Selective attention modulates face-specific induced gamma oscillations recorded from ventral occipitotemporal cortex. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(26):8780-6. PMC: 2918280. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1575-10.2010. View

2.
Pegna A, Landis T, Khateb A . Electrophysiological evidence for early non-conscious processing of fearful facial expressions. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008; 70(2):127-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.08.007. View

3.
Friston K, Harrison L, Daunizeau J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, Trujillo-Barreto N . Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. Neuroimage. 2007; 39(3):1104-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.048. View

4.
Kornmeier J, Bach M . Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. Psychophysiology. 2003; 41(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00126.x. View

5.
Haxby , Hoffman , Gobbini . The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(6):223-233. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0. View