» Articles » PMID: 21631592

Masseter Muscle Thickness, Chewing Efficiency and Bite Force in Edentulous Patients with Fixed and Removable Implant-supported Prostheses: a Cross-sectional Multicenter Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2011 Jun 3
PMID 21631592
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Edentulous patients may be restored with conventional dentures (C/C), implant-supported overdentures (IOD) or implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (IFDP). Null-hypotheses: chewing efficiency, maximum voluntary bite force (MBF) and masseter muscle thickness (MMT) are lower in patients with C/IOD compared with the patients with bimaxillary IFDPs. Both groups perform better than C/C and are inferior to fully dentate controls.

Material And Methods: Ethical approval was obtained. For this multicenter cross-sectional study, 80 patients were recruited. Four groups of different dental states comprised of either implant-supported prostheses (C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP) or served as control-groups (C/C and fully dentate D/D). Chewing efficiency was assessed with a two-colour mixing ability test. MBF was measured bilaterally with a force gauge. Two dimensional ultrasonography was used to measure MMT bilaterally.

Results: Chewing efficiency in C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP (difference NS) was better than in C/C, but not as good as in D/D. MBF in C/IOD was lower than in IFDP/IFDP. Chewing efficiency and MBF were significantly lower in IFDP/IFDP, who had experienced chipping or fracture of the prosthetic superstructure. Median MMT of patients with implant-supported prostheses was between those with C/C and fully dentate participants. There was no significant difference in MMT between C/IOD and IFDP/IFDP.

Conclusion: Supporting complete prostheses with oral implants seems to have positive effects on the thickness of the masseter muscle, maximum bite force as well as chewing efficiency. The type of implant-supported prostheses may have an influence on the magnitude of the effect.

Citing Articles

Dentures Used for Rehabilitation of Mastication After Loss of Teeth Maintain Proper Biomechanical Properties of Masseter Muscles-A Comparative Study.

Szajkowski S, Pasek J, Cieslar G Clin Pract. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39996702 PMC: 11854373. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15020032.


Improved Masticatory Performance in the Partially Edentulous Rehabilitated with Conventional Dental Prostheses.

Lopez-Cordon M, Khoury-Ribas L, Rovira-Lastra B, Ayuso-Montero R, Martinez-Gomis J Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39596975 PMC: 11596389. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111790.


Assessment of Reliability, Agreement, and Accuracy of Masseter Muscle Ultrasound Thickness Measurement Using a New Standardized Protocol.

Rogulski M, Palac M, Wolny T, Linek P Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202261 PMC: 11354011. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161771.


Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of a Completely Edentulous Patient by Salvaging Ailing Implants Using a Bar Retained Over Denture: A Case Report.

Akhtarkhavari M, Rajagopal P, Da Costa G, Aras M, Chitre V, Naik S Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63157.

PMID: 39070396 PMC: 11281885. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63157.


Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study.

Nabil M, Mahanna F, Said M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):672.

PMID: 38851676 PMC: 11162030. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04389-1.