» Articles » PMID: 21625280

Practical Guidelines for Radiographers to Improve Computed Radiography Image Quality

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2011 Jun 1
PMID 21625280
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computed Radiography (CR) has become a major digital imaging modality in a modern radiological department. CR system changes workflow from the conventional way of using film/screen by employing photostimulable phosphor plate technology. This results in the changing perspectives of technical, artefacts and quality control issues in radiology departments. Guidelines for better image quality in digital medical enterprise include professional guidelines for users and the quality control programme specifically designed to serve the best quality of clinical images. Radiographers who understand technological shift of the CR from conventional method can employ optimization of CR images. Proper anatomic collimation and exposure techniques for each radiographic projection are crucial steps in producing quality digital images. Matching image processing with specific anatomy is also important factor that radiographers should realise. Successful shift from conventional to fully digitised radiology department requires skilful radiographers who utilise the technology and a successful quality control program from teamwork in the department.

Citing Articles

Saudi Radiology Personnel's Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Implementation: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Qurashi A, Alanazi R, Alhazmi Y, Almohammadi A, Alsharif W, Alshamrani K J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021; 14:3225-3231.

PMID: 34848967 PMC: 8627310. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S340786.


Educational Module Intervention for Radiographers to Reduce Repetition Rate of Routine Digital Chest Radiography in Makkah Region of Saudi Arabia Tertiary Hospitals: Protocol of a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Almalki A, Abdul Manaf R, Juni M, Kadir Shahar H, Noor N, Gabbad A JMIR Res Protoc. 2017; 6(9):e185.

PMID: 28951379 PMC: 5635235. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.8007.


Diagnostic Value of Conventional and Digital Radiography for Detection of Cavitated and Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries.

Dehghani M, Barzegari R, Tabatabai H, Ghanea S J Dent (Tehran). 2017; 14(1):21-30.

PMID: 28828014 PMC: 5557993.


Radiographers' professional knowledge regarding parameters and safety issues in plain radiography: a questionnaire survey.

Farajollahi A, Fouladi D, Ghojazadeh M, Movafaghi A Br J Radiol. 2014; 87(1040):20140090.

PMID: 24827380 PMC: 4112399. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140090.


A survey of digital radiography practice in four South African teaching hospitals: an illuminative study.

Nyathi T, Chirwa T, van der Merwe D Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2011; 6(1):e5.

PMID: 21611065 PMC: 3097796. DOI: 10.2349/biij.6.1.e5.

References
1.
Samei E, Seibert J, Willis C, Flynn M, Mah E, Junck K . Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. Med Phys. 2001; 28(3):361-71. DOI: 10.1118/1.1350586. View

2.
Fujita H, Ueda K, Morishita J, Fujikawa T, Ohtsuka A, Sai T . Basic imaging properties of a computed radiographic system with photostimulable phosphors. Med Phys. 1989; 16(1):52-9. DOI: 10.1118/1.596402. View

3.
Rowlands J . The physics of computed radiography. Phys Med Biol. 2002; 47(23):R123-66. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/23/201. View

4.
Cesar L, Schueler B, Zink F, Daly T, Taubel J, Jorgenson L . Artefacts found in computed radiography. Br J Radiol. 2001; 74(878):195-202. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.74.878.740195. View

5.
Cesar L . Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers. Radiol Technol. 1997; 68(3):225-32. View