» Articles » PMID: 21569623

The Nature, Scope and Impact of Genomic Prediction in Beef Cattle in the United States

Overview
Journal Genet Sel Evol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2011 May 17
PMID 21569623
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Artificial selection has proven to be effective at altering the performance of animal production systems. Nevertheless, selection based on assessment of the genetic superiority of candidates is suboptimal as a result of errors in the prediction of genetic merit. Conventional breeding programs may extend phenotypic measurements on selection candidates to include correlated indicator traits, or delay selection decisions well beyond puberty so that phenotypic performance can be observed on progeny or other relatives. Extending the generation interval to increase the accuracy of selection reduces annual rates of gain compared to accurate selection and use of parents of the next generation at the immediate time they reach breeding age. Genomic prediction aims at reducing prediction errors at breeding age by exploiting information on the transmission of chromosome fragments from parents to selection candidates, in conjunction with knowledge on the value of every chromosome fragment. For genomic prediction to influence beef cattle breeding programs and the rate or cost of genetic gains, training analyses must be undertaken, and genomic prediction tools made available for breeders and other industry stakeholders. This paper reviews the nature or kind of studies currently underway, the scope or extent of some of those studies, and comments on the likely predictive value of genomic information for beef cattle improvement.

Citing Articles

Cows that are less active in the chute have more optimal grazing distribution.

Creamer M, Horback K Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):58.

PMID: 39747238 PMC: 11696303. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84090-z.


Leveraging Functional Genomics for Understanding Beef Quality Complexities and Breeding Beef Cattle for Improved Meat Quality.

Tian R, Mahmoodi M, Tian J, Esmailizadeh Koshkoiyeh S, Zhao M, Saminzadeh M Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39202463 PMC: 11353656. DOI: 10.3390/genes15081104.


Marker Density and Models to Improve the Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Growth and Slaughter Traits in Meat Rabbits.

Li W, Li W, Song Z, Gao Z, Xie K, Wang Y Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(4).

PMID: 38674388 PMC: 11050255. DOI: 10.3390/genes15040454.


Improving Breeding Value Reliability with Genomic Data in Breeding Groups of Charolais.

Brzakova M, Vesela Z, Vareka J, Bauer J Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(12).

PMID: 38136964 PMC: 10743247. DOI: 10.3390/genes14122139.


Harnessing Genomics and Transcriptomics Approaches to Improve Female Fertility in Beef Cattle-A Review.

Kertz N, Banerjee P, Dyce P, Diniz W Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37894009 PMC: 10603720. DOI: 10.3390/ani13203284.


References
1.
Golden B, Garrick D, Benyshek L . Milestones in beef cattle genetic evaluation. J Anim Sci. 2008; 87(14 Suppl):E3-10. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1430. View

2.
Toosi A, Fernando R, Dekkers J . Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. J Anim Sci. 2009; 88(1):32-46. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-1975. View

3.
McClure M, Morsci N, Schnabel R, Kim J, Yao P, Rolf M . A genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing carcass, post-natal growth and reproductive traits in commercial Angus cattle. Anim Genet. 2010; 41(6):597-607. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02063.x. View

4.
Georges M, Nielsen D, MacKinnon M, Mishra A, Okimoto R, Pasquino A . Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics. 1995; 139(2):907-20. PMC: 1206390. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.907. View

5.
Matukumalli L, Lawley C, Schnabel R, Taylor J, Allan M, Heaton M . Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS One. 2009; 4(4):e5350. PMC: 2669730. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350. View