» Articles » PMID: 21508243

Visual Search Demands Dictate Reliance on Working Memory Storage

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Apr 22
PMID 21508243
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research suggested that working memory (WM) does not play any significant role in visual search. In three experiments, we investigated the search difficulty and individual differences in WM capacity as determinants of WM involvement during visual search tasks, using both behavioral and electrophysiological markers [i.e., the contralateral delay activity (CDA), which is a marker for WM capacity allocation]. Human participants performed a visual search task that contained a target, neutral distractors, and a flanker distractor. Overall, we found that, as the search difficulty increased (as indicated by longer reaction times), so did the role of WM in performing the search task (as indicated by larger CDA amplitudes). Moreover, the results pinpoint a dissociation between the two types of factors that determined the WM involvement in the search process. Namely, individual differences in WM capacity and search difficulty independently affected the degree to which the search process relied on WM. Instead of showing a progressive role, individual differences in WM capacity correlated with the search efficiency in all search conditions (i.e., easy, medium, and difficult). Counterintuitively, individuals with high WM capacity generally relied less on WM during the search task.

Citing Articles

Neurocognitive dynamics and behavioral differences of symmetry and asymmetry processing in working memory: insights from fNIRS.

Sztuka I, Kuhn S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4740.

PMID: 39922837 PMC: 11807122. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84988-8.


How expectations alter search performance.

Paquette N, Schmidt J Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(2):334-353.

PMID: 39915432 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-025-03022-9.


Electrophysiology Reveals That Intuitive Physics Guides Visual Tracking and Working Memory.

Balaban H, Smith K, Tenenbaum J, Ullman T Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:1425-1446.

PMID: 39664257 PMC: 11634321. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00174.


Exploring the Impact of an Interactive Electronic Pegboard on Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Skills of Patients With Stroke: Preliminary Analysis.

Chien S, Wu C, Wong A, Chen C, Beckman S JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e55481.

PMID: 39446480 PMC: 11544338. DOI: 10.2196/55481.


Effects of top-down and bottom-up attention on post-selection posterior contralateral negativity.

Rashal E, Santandrea E, Ben-Hamed S, Macaluso E, Chelazzi L, Boehler C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(3):705-717.

PMID: 36788197 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02636-7.


References
1.
Johnson D, McGrath A, McNeil C . Cuing interacts with perceptual load in visual search. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(3):284-7. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00452. View

2.
Prime D, Jolicoeur P . Mental rotation requires visual short-term memory: evidence from human electric cortical activity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(11):2437-46. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21337. View

3.
Awh E, Vogel E . The bouncer in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 11(1):5-6. DOI: 10.1038/nn0108-5. View

4.
Chelazzi L, Miller E, Duncan J, DeSimone R . A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature. 1993; 363(6427):345-7. DOI: 10.1038/363345a0. View

5.
Brisson B, Jolicoeur P . A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 2007; 44(2):323-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00503.x. View