» Articles » PMID: 21490287

Response Variability to High Rates of Electric Stimulation in Retinal Ganglion Cells

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2011 Apr 15
PMID 21490287
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To improve the quality of prosthetic vision, it is important to understand how retinal neurons respond to electric stimulation. Previous studies present conflicting reports as to the maximum rate at which retinal ganglion cells can "follow" pulse trains, i.e., generate one spike for each pulse of the train. In the present study, we measured the response of 5 different types of rabbit retinal ganglion cells to pulse trains of 100-700 Hz. Surprisingly, we found significant heterogeneity in the ability of different types to follow pulse trains. For example, brisk transient (BT) ganglion cells could reliably follow pulse rates up to 600 pulses per second (PPS). In contrast, other types could not even follow rates of 200 PPS. There was additional heterogeneity in the response patterns across those types that could not follow high-rate trains. For example, some types generated action potentials in response to approximately every other pulse, whereas other types generated one spike per pulse for a few consecutive pulses and then did not generate any spikes in response to the next few pulses. Interestingly, in the types that could not follow high-rate trains, we found a second type of response: many pulses of the train elicited a biphasic waveform with an amplitude much smaller than that of standard action potentials. This small waveform was often observed following every pulse for which a standard spike was not elicited. A possible origin of the small waveform and its implication for effective retinal stimulation are discussed.

Citing Articles

Membrane depolarization mediates both the inhibition of neural activity and cell-type-differences in response to high-frequency stimulation.

Lee J, Werginz P, Kameneva T, Im M, Fried S Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):734.

PMID: 38890481 PMC: 11189419. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06359-3.


Modulation of Visual Contrast Sensitivity with tRNS across the Visual System, Evidence from Stimulation and Simulation.

Potok W, Post A, Beliaeva V, Bachinger M, Cassara A, Neufeld E eNeuro. 2023; 10(6).

PMID: 37263793 PMC: 10278678. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0177-22.2023.


Sensitivity to extracellular potassium underlies type-intrinsic differences in retinal ganglion cell excitability.

Boal A, McGrady N, Risner M, Calkins D Front Cell Neurosci. 2022; 16:966425.

PMID: 35990894 PMC: 9390602. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2022.966425.


Orbitofrontal cortex contributes to the comparison of values underlying economic choices.

Ballesta S, Shi W, Padoa-Schioppa C Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):4405.

PMID: 35906242 PMC: 9338286. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32199-y.


Artificial Visual Information Produced by Retinal Prostheses.

Kim S, Roh H, Im M Front Cell Neurosci. 2022; 16:911754.

PMID: 35734216 PMC: 9208577. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2022.911754.


References
1.
van Wyk M, Taylor W, Vaney D . Local edge detectors: a substrate for fine spatial vision at low temporal frequencies in rabbit retina. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(51):13250-63. PMC: 6675005. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1991-06.2006. View

2.
Hu W, Tian C, Li T, Yang M, Hou H, Shu Y . Distinct contributions of Na(v)1.6 and Na(v)1.2 in action potential initiation and backpropagation. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12(8):996-1002. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2359. View

3.
Grumet A, WYATT Jr J, Rizzo 3rd J . Multi-electrode stimulation and recording in the isolated retina. J Neurosci Methods. 2000; 101(1):31-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00246-6. View

4.
Margalit E, Thoreson W . Inner retinal mechanisms engaged by retinal electrical stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(6):2606-12. PMC: 2474546. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1093. View

5.
Ye J, Goo Y . The slow wave component of retinal activity in rd/rd mice recorded with a multi-electrode array. Physiol Meas. 2007; 28(9):1079-88. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/9/009. View