» Articles » PMID: 21487401

Comparative Analysis of Erk Phosphorylation Suggests a Mixed Strategy for Measuring Phospho-form Distributions

Overview
Journal Mol Syst Biol
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2011 Apr 14
PMID 21487401
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The functional impact of multisite protein phosphorylation can depend on both the numbers and the positions of phosphorylated sites-the global pattern of phosphorylation or 'phospho-form'-giving biological systems profound capabilities for dynamic information processing. A central problem in quantitative systems biology, therefore, is to measure the 'phospho-form distribution': the relative amount of each of the 2(n) phospho-forms of a protein with n-phosphorylation sites. We compared four potential methods-western blots with phospho-specific antibodies, peptide-based liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectrometry (MS; pepMS), protein-based LC/MS (proMS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR)-on differentially phosphorylated samples of the well-studied mitogen-activated protein kinase Erk2, with two phosphorylation sites. The MS methods were quantitatively consistent with each other and with NMR to within 10%, but western blots, while highly sensitive, showed significant discrepancies with MS. NMR also uncovered two additional phosphorylations, for which a combination of pepMS and proMS yielded an estimate of the 16-member phospho-form distribution. This combined MS strategy provides an optimal mixture of accuracy and coverage for quantifying distributions, but positional isomers remain a challenging problem.

Citing Articles

An ultrasensitive fiveplex activity assay for cellular kinases.

Smolko C, Janes K Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):19409.

PMID: 31857650 PMC: 6923413. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55998-8.


Estimating the Distribution of Protein Post-Translational Modification States by Mass Spectrometry.

Compton P, Kelleher N, Gunawardena J J Proteome Res. 2018; 17(8):2727-2734.

PMID: 29945451 PMC: 6076341. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00150.


Proteins and Proteoforms: New Separation Challenges.

Regnier F, Kim J Anal Chem. 2017; 90(1):361-373.

PMID: 29207237 PMC: 5808416. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05007.


Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for the Identification of Multiple Phosphorylations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Danis C, Despres C, Bessa L, Malki I, Merzougui H, Huvent I J Vis Exp. 2017; (118).

PMID: 28060278 PMC: 5226463. DOI: 10.3791/55001.


Long-term dynamics of multisite phosphorylation.

Rubinstein B, Mattingly H, Berezhkovskii A, Shvartsman S Mol Biol Cell. 2016; 27(14):2331-40.

PMID: 27226482 PMC: 4945148. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E16-03-0137.


References
1.
Han X, Jin M, Breuker K, McLafferty F . Extending top-down mass spectrometry to proteins with masses greater than 200 kilodaltons. Science. 2006; 314(5796):109-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.1128868. View

2.
Kirkpatrick D, Gerber S, Gygi S . The absolute quantification strategy: a general procedure for the quantification of proteins and post-translational modifications. Methods. 2005; 35(3):265-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.08.018. View

3.
Timm W, Ozlu N, Steen J, Steen H . Effect of high-accuracy precursor masses on phosphopeptide identification from MS3 spectra. Anal Chem. 2010; 82(10):3977-80. DOI: 10.1021/ac100118u. View

4.
Pufall M, Lee G, Nelson M, Kang H, Velyvis A, Kay L . Variable control of Ets-1 DNA binding by multiple phosphates in an unstructured region. Science. 2005; 309(5731):142-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1111915. View

5.
Ulintz P, Yocum A, Bodenmiller B, Aebersold R, Andrews P, Nesvizhskii A . Comparison of MS(2)-only, MSA, and MS(2)/MS(3) methodologies for phosphopeptide identification. J Proteome Res. 2008; 8(2):887-99. PMC: 2734953. DOI: 10.1021/pr800535h. View