Revealing Protein Oligomerization and Densities in Situ Using Spatial Intensity Distribution Analysis

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 2011 Apr 13

PMID 21482753

Citations 41

Authors

Antoine G Godin

Santiago Costantino

Louis-Etienne Lorenzo

Jody L Swift

Mikhail Sergeev

Alfredo Ribeiro-da-Silva

Yves De Koninck

Paul W Wiseman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Measuring protein interactions is key to understanding cell signaling mechanisms, but quantitative analysis of these interactions in situ has remained a major challenge. Here, we present spatial intensity distribution analysis (SpIDA), an analysis technique for image data obtained using standard fluorescence microscopy. SpIDA directly measures fluorescent macromolecule densities and oligomerization states sampled within single images. The method is based on fitting intensity histograms calculated from images to obtain density maps of fluorescent molecules and their quantal brightness. Because spatial distributions are acquired by imaging, SpIDA can be applied to the analysis of images of chemically fixed tissue as well as live cells. However, the technique does not rely on spatial correlations, freeing it from biases caused by subcellular compartmentalization and heterogeneity within tissue samples. Analysis of computer-based simulations and immunocytochemically stained GABA(B) receptors in spinal cord samples shows that the approach yields accurate measurements over a broader range of densities than established procedures. SpIDA is applicable to sampling within small areas (6 μm(2)) and reveals the presence of monomers and dimers with single-dye labeling. Finally, using GFP-tagged receptor subunits, we show that SpIDA can resolve dynamic changes in receptor oligomerization in live cells. The advantages and greater versatility of SpIDA over current techniques open the door to quantificative studies of protein interactions in native tissue using standard fluorescence microscopy.

Citing Articles

Quantifying biomolecular organisation in membranes with brightness-transit statistics.

Schneider F, Cespedes P, Karedla N, Dustin M, Fritzsche M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7082.

PMID: 39152104 PMC: 11329664. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51435-1.

GLUT4 dispersal at the plasma membrane of adipocytes: a super-resolved journey.

Geiser A, Foylan S, Tinning P, Bryant N, Gould G Biosci Rep. 2023; 43(10).

PMID: 37791639 PMC: 10600063. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20230946.

Modulation of Biofilm Formation and Permeability Streptococcus mutans during Exposure To Zinc Acetate.

Buzza K, Pluen A, Doherty C, Cheesapcharoen T, Singh G, Ledder R Microbiol Spectr. 2023; :e0252722.

PMID: 36809043 PMC: 10100724. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02527-22.

The dependence of EGFR oligomerization on environment and structure: A camera-based N&B study.

Balasubramanian H, Sankaran J, Pandey S, Goh C, Wohland T Biophys J. 2022; 121(23):4452-4466.

PMID: 36335429 PMC: 9748371. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.003.

Quantitative Super-Resolution Imaging for the Analysis of GPCR Oligomerization.

Joseph M, Tomas Bort E, Grose R, McCormick P, Simoncelli S Biomolecules. 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34680136 PMC: 8533726. DOI: 10.3390/biom11101503.

References

Corry B, Jayatilaka D, Rigby P . A flexible approach to the calculation of resonance energy transfer efficiency between multiple donors and acceptors in complex geometries. Biophys J. 2005; 89(6):3822-36. PMC: 1366949. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.069351. View

Swift J, Godin A, Dore K, Freland L, Bouchard N, Nimmo C . Quantification of receptor tyrosine kinase transactivation through direct dimerization and surface density measurements in single cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(17):7016-21. PMC: 3084083. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018280108. View

Haustein E, Schwille P . Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: novel variations of an established technique. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2007; 36:151-69. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132612. View

Almarestani L, Waters S, Krause J, Bennett G, Ribeiro-da-Silva A . Morphological characterization of spinal cord dorsal horn lamina I neurons projecting to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2007; 504(3):287-97. DOI: 10.1002/cne.21410. View

Ulbrich M, Isacoff E . Subunit counting in membrane-bound proteins. Nat Methods. 2007; 4(4):319-21. PMC: 2744285. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1024. View

Schlessinger J . Ligand-induced, receptor-mediated dimerization and activation of EGF receptor. Cell. 2002; 110(6):669-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00966-2. View

Costantino S, Comeau J, Kolin D, Wiseman P . Accuracy and dynamic range of spatial image correlation and cross-correlation spectroscopy. Biophys J. 2005; 89(2):1251-60. PMC: 1366609. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.057364. View

Digman M, Brown C, Sengupta P, Wiseman P, Horwitz A, Gratton E . Measuring fast dynamics in solutions and cells with a laser scanning microscope. Biophys J. 2005; 89(2):1317-27. PMC: 1366616. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.062836. View

Nagy A, Wu J, Berland K . Observation volumes and {gamma}-factors in two-photon fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy. Biophys J. 2005; 89(3):2077-90. PMC: 1366710. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.052779. View

10.

Mohler H, Fritschy J . GABAB receptors make it to the top--as dimers. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1999; 20(3):87-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-6147(99)01323-1. View

11.

Kask P, Palo K, Ullmann D, Gall K . Fluorescence-intensity distribution analysis and its application in biomolecular detection technology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(24):13756-61. PMC: 24137. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13756. View

12.

Magde D, Elson E, Webb W . Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. II. An experimental realization. Biopolymers. 1974; 13(1):29-61. DOI: 10.1002/bip.1974.360130103. View

13.

Kolin D, Wiseman P . Advances in image correlation spectroscopy: measuring number densities, aggregation states, and dynamics of fluorescently labeled macromolecules in cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2007; 49(3):141-64. DOI: 10.1007/s12013-007-9000-5. View

14.

Lujan R, Shigemoto R . Localization of metabotropic GABA receptor subunits GABAB1 and GABAB2 relative to synaptic sites in the rat developing cerebellum. Eur J Neurosci. 2006; 23(6):1479-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04669.x. View

15.

Jan Y, Jan L . Function of GB1 and GB2 subunits in G protein coupling of GABA(B) receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(25):14649-54. PMC: 64736. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.251554498. View

16.

Digman M, Dalal R, Horwitz A, Gratton E . Mapping the number of molecules and brightness in the laser scanning microscope. Biophys J. 2007; 94(6):2320-32. PMC: 2257897. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114645. View

17.

Gurevich V, Gurevich E . GPCR monomers and oligomers: it takes all kinds. Trends Neurosci. 2008; 31(2):74-81. PMC: 2366802. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.11.007. View

18.

Chen Y, Muller J, So P, Gratton E . The photon counting histogram in fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy. Biophys J. 1999; 77(1):553-67. PMC: 1300352. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76912-2. View

19.

Gales C, Rebois R, Hogue M, Trieu P, Breit A, Hebert T . Real-time monitoring of receptor and G-protein interactions in living cells. Nat Methods. 2005; 2(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth743. View

20.

Vukojevic V, Heidkamp M, Ming Y, Johansson B, Terenius L, Rigler R . Quantitative single-molecule imaging by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(47):18176-81. PMC: 2587633. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809250105. View