» Articles » PMID: 21472470

Measurements of Knee Morphometrics Using MRI and Arthroscopy: a Comparative Study Between ACL-injured and Non-injured Subjects

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2011 Apr 8
PMID 21472470
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was as follows: (1) to compare bony morphology in subjects with and without ACL injury. The secondary purposes were the following: (2) to compare bony morphology between men and women and (3) to determine whether MRI measurements of the notch correlate with intra-operative measurements.

Methods: MRI measurements of NW, bicondylar width, medial condyle size and lateral condyle size, and medial-to-lateral condyle ratio (M:L) were taken from 45 subjects with ACL injury and 44 subjects without ACL injury, by two independent observers. In addition, notch width measurements were taken arthroscopically in the 45 injured subjects. Knee morphometrics were compared between men and women. Additionally, values of ACL-injured and non-injured subjects were compared for male and female subjects separately. Correlations between notch measurements taken from MRI and measured arthroscopically were determined. Reliability of the MRI measurements was calculated.

Results: Significant differences were found for bicondylar width (P = 0.001), medial condyle width (P = 0.002), and lateral condyle width (P = 0.002) between male and female subjects. When bony morphology was compared between ACL-injured and non-injured subjects, the male subjects showed significant differences for bicondylar width (P = 0.002) and medial condyle width (P = 0.008). For the female subjects, significant differences were found for bicondylar width (P = 0.009) and lateral condyle width (P = 0.002). There was no correlation between notch width measured on the MRI's and NW measured intra-operatively. The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the MRI measurements was satisfactory.

Conclusions: There were differences in bony morphology between men and women and between subjects with and without ACL injury. The bony morphology that was different between ACL-injured and non-injured subjects varied between male and female subjects.

Citing Articles

ACL surgery: reasons for failure and management.

Diquattro E, Jahnke S, Traina F, Perdisa F, Becker R, Kopf S EFORT Open Rev. 2023; 8(5):319-330.

PMID: 37158438 PMC: 10233814. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0085.


Can MRI knee joint measurements predict the population at risk of ACL injury?.

Hamdan M, Haddad B, Alshrouf M, Azzam M, Isleem U, Hamasha R BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022; 14(1):98.

PMID: 35655282 PMC: 9161517. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00495-1.


Does Femoral Intercondylar Notch Volume Differ in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Adult Patients Compared to the Uninjured?: A Meta-Analysis.

Jha V, Azam M, Jain P, Bali S Clin Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(1):76-89.

PMID: 35251544 PMC: 8858901. DOI: 10.4055/cios20163.


The Lateral Femoral Condyle Index Is Not a Risk Factor for Primary Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Nowak E, Beaulieu M, Beynnon B, Ashton-Miller J, Sturnick D, Wojtys E Am J Sports Med. 2021; 50(1):85-92.

PMID: 34846175 PMC: 8732325. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211057271.


Diagnostic performance of DIXON sequences on low-field scanner for the evaluation of knee joint pathology.

Bellisari F, Bruno F, Monti R, Cicerone C, Palumbo P, Arrigoni F Acta Biomed. 2021; 92(S5):e2021403.

PMID: 34505845 PMC: 8477066. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92iS5.11870.


References
1.
Oliphant J, Drawbert J . Gender differences in anterior cruciate ligament injury rates in wisconsin intercollegiate basketball. J Athl Train. 1996; 31(3):245-7. PMC: 1318512. View

2.
Shelbourne K, Davis T, Klootwyk T . The relationship between intercondylar notch width of the femur and the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26(3):402-8. DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260031001. View

3.
Lindenfeld T, Schmitt D, Hendy M, Mangine R, Noyes F . Incidence of injury in indoor soccer. Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22(3):364-71. DOI: 10.1177/036354659402200312. View

4.
Anderson A, Anderson C, Gorman T, Cross M, Spindler K . Radiographic measurements of the intercondylar notch: are they accurate?. Arthroscopy. 2007; 23(3):261-8, 268.e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.003. View

5.
Anderson A, LIPSCOMB A, Liudahl K, Addlestone R . Analysis of the intercondylar notch by computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 1987; 15(6):547-52. DOI: 10.1177/036354658701500605. View