» Articles » PMID: 19421737

Correlation Between the Morphometric Parameters of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and the Intercondylar Width: Gender and Age Differences

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2009 May 8
PMID 19421737
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study was conducted on 50 cadavers (32 male and 18 female, aged 15-53 years; mean 34; SD 11) with intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), without diagnosed gonarthrosis of the knee joint. The following anatomical parameters of the ACL were measured: the length of anteromedial and posterolateral bundle, the mean length and the width of the ligament, the length and width of tibial insertion, the length and width of femoral insertion. The intercondylar width was measured at the level of popliteal groove. The width of male intercondylar notch (22 mm) was statistically significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the width of female intercondylar notch (18 mm). The width of the male ACL (12 mm) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the width of the female ACL (10 mm). The length of the male ACL femoral insertion (14 mm) was statistically significantly greater (P < 0.05) than in the female ACL femoral insertion (12 mm). Accordingly, with greater width of intercondylar notch, men have wider ACL than women. ACL width is in positive correlation with the male intercondylar notch width but it is not in correlation with the female intercondylar notch width. The width of male intercondylar notch correlates with the length and width of ACL femoral insertion. Taking into account the length and width of femoral insertion in examined cadaver knees, double bundle reconstruction would theoretically be possible in 76% of cases.

Citing Articles

Cadaveric Specimens Used in Studies Evaluating Bone Loss in Anterior Shoulder Instability Are Not Representative of the Affected Patient Population: A Systematic Review.

Karimi A, Singh-Varma A, Reddy R, Kolevar M, Lin A Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025; 7(1):100996.

PMID: 40041842 PMC: 11873496. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100996.


Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomy Focusing on the Mid-substance Insertion and Fan-like Extension Fibers.

Iriuchishima T, Goto B Indian J Orthop. 2022; 56(9):1525-1532.

PMID: 36052387 PMC: 9385902. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00695-4.


Sexual Dimorphisms in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Current Concepts Review.

Ellison T, Flagstaff I, Johnson A Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 9(12):23259671211025304.

PMID: 34993256 PMC: 8725014. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211025304.


The intercondylar fossa-A narrative review.

Hirtler L, Kainberger F, Rohrich S Clin Anat. 2021; 35(1):2-14.

PMID: 34374453 PMC: 9291140. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23773.


Predictive effects of the intercondylar notch morphology on anterior cruciate ligament injury in males: A magnetic resonance imaging analysis.

Huang M, Li Y, Li H, Liao C, Xu H, Luo X Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(10):e19411.

PMID: 32150091 PMC: 7478693. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019411.


References
1.
Giron F, Cuomo P, Aglietti P, Bull A, Amis A . Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 14(3):250-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-005-0685-y. View

2.
Shelbourne K, Davis T, Klootwyk T . The relationship between intercondylar notch width of the femur and the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26(3):402-8. DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260031001. View

3.
Arnoczky S . Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (172):19-25. View

4.
Edwards A, Bull A, Amis A . The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: Part 1: tibial attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15(12):1414-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0417-6. View

5.
Anderson A, LIPSCOMB A, Liudahl K, Addlestone R . Analysis of the intercondylar notch by computed tomography. Am J Sports Med. 1987; 15(6):547-52. DOI: 10.1177/036354658701500605. View