» Articles » PMID: 21454549

Effect of Kallikrein 4 Loss on Enamel Mineralization: Comparison with Mice Lacking Matrix Metalloproteinase 20

Overview
Journal J Biol Chem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2011 Apr 2
PMID 21454549
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Enamel formation depends on a triad of tissue-specific matrix proteins (amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin) to help initiate and stabilize progressively elongating, thin mineral ribbons of hydroxyapatite formed during an appositional growth phase. Subsequently, these proteins are eradicated to facilitate lateral expansion of the hydroxyapatite crystallites. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in enamel mineralization occurring in mice unable to produce kallikrein 4 (Klk4), a proteinase associated with terminal extracellular degradation of matrix proteins during the maturation stage. Mice lacking functional matrix metalloproteinase 20 (Mmp20), a proteinase associated with early cleavage of matrix proteins during the secretory stage, were also analyzed as a frame of reference. The results indicated that mice lacking Klk4 produce enamel that is normal in thickness and overall organization in terms of layers and rod/inter-rod structure, but there is a developmental defect in enamel rods where they first form near the dentinoenamel junction. Mineralization is normal up to early maturation after which the enamel both retains and gains additional proteins and is unable to mature beyond 85% mineral by weight. The outmost enamel is hard, but inner regions are soft and contain much more protein than normal. The rate of mineral acquisition overall is lower by 25%. Mice lacking functional Mmp20 produce enamel that is thin and structurally abnormal. Relatively high amounts of protein remain throughout maturation, but the enamel is able to change from 67 to 75% mineral by weight during maturation. These findings reaffirm the importance of secreted proteinases to enamel mineral acquisition.

Citing Articles

Enamel Structure Defects in Missense Mutation Knock-in Mice.

Li P, Zeng B, Xie W, Xiao X, Lin L, Yu D Biomedicines. 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36831017 PMC: 9953722. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020482.


Surface and Structural Studies of Age-Related Changes in Dental Enamel: An Animal Model.

Swietlicka I, Tomaszewska E, Muszynski S, Swietlicki M, Skrzypek T, Grudzinski W Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(11).

PMID: 35683290 PMC: 9182525. DOI: 10.3390/ma15113993.


Loss of BMP2 and BMP4 Signaling in the Dental Epithelium Causes Defective Enamel Maturation and Aberrant Development of Ameloblasts.

Reibring C, El Shahawy M, Hallberg K, Harfe B, Linde A, Gritli-Linde A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(11).

PMID: 35682776 PMC: 9180982. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23116095.


Tooth Enamel and its Dynamic Protein Matrix.

Gil-Bona A, Bidlack F Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(12).

PMID: 32585904 PMC: 7352428. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124458.


Dental malformations associated with biallelic MMP20 mutations.

Wang S, Zhang H, Chavez M, Hu Y, Seymen F, Koruyucu M Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020; 8(8):e1307.

PMID: 32495503 PMC: 7434610. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1307.


References
1.
Hu J, Yamakoshi Y . Enamelin and autosomal-dominant amelogenesis imperfecta. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003; 14(6):387-98. DOI: 10.1177/154411130301400602. View

2.
Lacruz R, Nanci A, Kurtz I, Wright J, Paine M . Regulation of pH During Amelogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2009; 86(2):91-103. PMC: 2809306. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-009-9326-7. View

3.
Hart P, Hart T, Michalec M, Ryu O, Simmons D, Hong S . Mutation in kallikrein 4 causes autosomal recessive hypomaturation amelogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet. 2004; 41(7):545-9. PMC: 1735847. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2003.017657. View

4.
Smith C, Nanci A . Protein dynamics of amelogenesis. Anat Rec. 1996; 245(2):186-207. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199606)245:2<186::AID-AR7>3.0.CO;2-V. View

5.
Bartlett J, Skobe Z, Lee D, Wright J, Li Y, Kulkarni A . A developmental comparison of matrix metalloproteinase-20 and amelogenin null mouse enamel. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006; 114 Suppl 1:18-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00292.x. View