» Articles » PMID: 21452939

Choosing Our Words: Retrieval and Selection Processes Recruit Shared Neural Substrates in Left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Apr 2
PMID 21452939
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When we speak, we constantly retrieve and select words for production in the face of multiple possible alternatives. Our ability to respond in such underdetermined situations is supported by left ventrolateral prefrontal cortical (VLPFC) regions, but there is active debate about whether these regions support (1) selection between competing alternatives, (2) controlled retrieval from semantic memory, or (3) selection and controlled retrieval in distinct subregions of VLPFC (selection in mid-VLPFC and controlled retrieval in anterior VLPFC). Each of these theories has been supported by some prior evidence but challenged by other findings, leaving the debate unresolved. We propose that these discrepancies in the previous literature reflect problems in the way that selection and controlled retrieval processes have been operationalized and measured. Using improved measures, we find that shared neural substrates in left VLPFC support both selection and controlled retrieval, with no dissociation between mid and anterior regions. Moreover, selection and retrieval demands interact in left VLPFC, such that selection effects are greatest when retrieval demands are low, consistent with prior behavioral findings. These findings enable a synthesis and reinterpretation of prior evidence and suggest that the ability to respond in underdetermined situations is affected by both selection and retrieval mechanisms for verbal material subserved by left VLPFC, and these processes interact in meaningful ways.

Citing Articles

Individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty is primarily linked to the structure of inferior frontal regions.

Carlson 2nd K, Smolker H, Smith L, Synder H, Snyder H, Hankin B Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 39870976 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01262-0.


Cross-cultural comparison of the neural correlates of true and false memory retrieval.

Leger K, Cho I, Valoumas I, Schwartz D, Mair R, Goh J Memory. 2024; 32(10):1323-1340.

PMID: 38266009 PMC: 11266529. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2307923.


Role of cognitive control in resolving two types of conflict during spoken word production.

Steinberg Lowe M, Buchwald A Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2023; 38(8):1082-1097.

PMID: 37927968 PMC: 10622112. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2202917.


Graded functional organization in the left inferior frontal gyrus: evidence from task-free and task-based functional connectivity.

Diveica V, Riedel M, Salo T, Laird A, Jackson R, Binney R Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(23):11384-11399.

PMID: 37833772 PMC: 10690868. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad373.


Accumulating evidence for myriad alternatives: Modeling the generation of free association.

Fradkin I, Eldar E Psychol Rev. 2022; 130(6):1492-1520.

PMID: 36190752 PMC: 10159868. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000397.


References
1.
Basso M, Lowery N, Ghormley C, Combs D, Purdie R, Neel J . Comorbid anxiety corresponds with neuropsychological dysfunction in unipolar depression. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2007; 12(5):437-56. DOI: 10.1080/13546800701446517. View

2.
Gold B, Balota D, Jones S, Powell D, Smith C, Andersen A . Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(24):6523-32. PMC: 6674026. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0808-06.2006. View

3.
DEsposito M, Aguirre G, Farah M . Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 94(26):14792-7. PMC: 25116. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792. View

4.
Martin R, Cheng Y . Selection demands versus association strength in the verb generation task. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006; 13(3):396-401. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193859. View

5.
Wolfe M, Goldman S . Use of latent semantic analysis for predicting psychological phenomena: two issues and proposed solutions. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003; 35(1):22-31. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195494. View