» Articles » PMID: 15849891

Selection from Perceptual and Conceptual Representations

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2005 Apr 27
PMID 15849891
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The lateral prefrontal cortex has been implicated in a wide variety of functions that guide our behavior, and one such candidate function is selection. Selection mechanisms have been described in several domains spanning different stages of processing, from visual attention to response execution. Here, we consider two such mechanisms: selecting relevant information from the perceptual world (e.g., visual selective attention) and selecting relevant information from conceptual representations (e.g., selecting a specific attribute about an object from long-term memory). Although the mechanisms involved in visual selective attention have been well characterized, much less is known about the latter case of selection. In this article, we review the relevant literature from the attention domain as a springboard to understanding the mechanisms involved in conceptual selection.

Citing Articles

Words before pictures: the role of language in biasing visual attention.

Calignano G, Lorenzoni A, Semeraro G, Navarrete E Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1439397.

PMID: 39744025 PMC: 11688633. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1439397.


Electroencephalography (EEG) Evidence for the Psychological Processes of Humor Generation: A Comparison Perspective on Humor and Creativity.

Sun C, Zhou Z Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38667085 PMC: 11047550. DOI: 10.3390/bs14040290.


Reciprocal interactions among parietal and occipito-temporal representations support everyday object-directed actions.

Mahon B, Almeida J Neuropsychologia. 2024; 198:108841.

PMID: 38430962 PMC: 11498102. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108841.


The language network is not engaged in object categorization.

Benn Y, Ivanova A, Clark O, Mineroff Z, Seikus C, Silva J Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(19):10380-10400.

PMID: 37557910 PMC: 10545444. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad289.


Validated measures of semantic knowledge and semantic control: normative data from young and older adults for more than 300 semantic judgements.

Wu W, Hoffman P R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(2):211056.

PMID: 35223052 PMC: 8847894. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211056.


References
1.
Desmond J, Gabrieli J, Glover G . Dissociation of frontal and cerebellar activity in a cognitive task: evidence for a distinction between selection and search. Neuroimage. 1998; 7(4 Pt 1):368-76. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0340. View

2.
Swaab T, Baynes K, Knight R . Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: an ERP study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002; 15(1):99-103. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00219-7. View

3.
Hodges J, Graham N, Patterson K . Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory. Memory. 1995; 3(3-4):463-95. DOI: 10.1080/09658219508253161. View

4.
Damian M, Vigliocco G, Levelt W . Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition. 2001; 81(3):B77-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00135-4. View

5.
Fuster J . Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory. J Neurophysiol. 1973; 36(1):61-78. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.1.61. View