» Articles » PMID: 21431411

Semi-automatic Determination of Detailed Vertebral Shape from Lumbar Radiographs Using Active Appearance Models

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2011 Mar 25
PMID 21431411
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Summary: The vertebral endplates in lumbar radiographs were located by a semi-automatic annotation method using statistical shape models.

Introduction: Vertebral fractures are common osteoporotic fractures, but current quantitative detection methods (morphometry) lack specificity. We have previously developed more specific quantitative classifiers of vertebral fracture using shape and appearance models. This method has only been applied to DXA vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) images and not to spinal radiographs. The classifiers require a detailed annotation of the outline of the vertebral endplate, so we investigated the application of similar semi-automated annotation methods to lumbar radiographs as the initial step in the generalisation of the statistical classifiers used in VFA images.

Methods: The vertebral body outlines in a training set of 670 lumbar radiographs were manually annotated by expert radiologists. This training set was used to build statistical models of vertebral shape and appearance using triplets of vertebrae. In order to segment vertebrae, the models were refitted using a sequence of active appearance models of vertebral triplets, using a miss-40-out train/test cross-validation experiment. The accuracy was evaluated against the manual annotation and analysed by fracture grade.

Results: Good accuracy was obtained for normal vertebrae (0.82 mm) and fracture grades 1 and 2 (1.19 mm), but the localisation accuracy deteriorated for grade 3 fractures to 2.12 mm.

Conclusion: Vertebral body shape annotation can be substantially automated on lumbar radiographs. However, an occasional manual correction may be required, typically with either severe fractures, or when there is a high degree of projectional tilting or scoliosis. The located detailed shapes may enable the development of more powerful quantitative classifiers of osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Citing Articles

Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporosis, fragile bone strength and vertebral fractures from routine CT scans; a review of approved technology systems and pathways to implementation.

Aggarwal V, Maslen C, Abel R, Bhattacharya P, Bromiley P, Clark E Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13:1759720X211024029.

PMID: 34290831 PMC: 8274099. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X211024029.


Diagnosis of vertebral fractures in children: is a simplified algorithm-based qualitative technique reliable?.

Adiotomre E, Summers L, Allison A, Walters S, Digby M, Broadley P Pediatr Radiol. 2016; 46(5):680-8.

PMID: 26902300 PMC: 4841845. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3537-z.


Automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in routine thoracic and abdominal MDCT.

Baum T, Bauer J, Klinder T, Dobritz M, Rummeny E, Noel P Eur Radiol. 2014; 24(4):872-80.

PMID: 24425527 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3089-2.


The lumbar spine has an intrinsic shape specific to each individual that remains a characteristic throughout flexion and extension.

Pavlova A, Meakin J, Cooper K, Barr R, Aspden R Eur Spine J. 2014; 23 Suppl 1:S26-32.

PMID: 24413745 PMC: 3946102. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3162-1.


Review of radiological scoring methods of osteoporotic vertebral fractures for clinical and research settings.

Oei L, Rivadeneira F, Ly F, Breda S, Zillikens M, Hofman A Eur Radiol. 2012; 23(2):476-86.

PMID: 22892721 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2622-z.


References
1.
Gehlbach S, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood J . Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(7):577-82. DOI: 10.1007/s001980070078. View

2.
Wu C, Li J, Jergas M, Genant H . Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1995; 5(5):354-70. DOI: 10.1007/BF01622258. View

3.
Ferrar L, Jiang G, Barrington N, Eastell R . Identification of vertebral deformities in women: comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res. 2000; 15(3):575-85. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.3.575. View

4.
Genant H, Wu C, van Kuijk C, Nevitt M . Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993; 8(9):1137-48. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080915. View

5.
Black D, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Genant H, Epstein R, San Valentin R . Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 1995; 10(6):890-902. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100610. View