» Articles » PMID: 21430260

Effect of Immunohistochemistry on Molecular Analysis of Tissue Samples: Implications for Microdissection Technologies

Abstract

Laser-based tissue microdissection is an important tool for the molecular evaluation of histological sections. The technology has continued to advance since its initial commercialization in the 1990s, with improvements in many aspects of the process. More recent developments are tailored toward an automated, operator-independent mode that relies on antibodies as targeting probes, such as immuno-laser capture microdissection or expression microdissection (xMD). Central to the utility of expression-based dissection techniques is the effect of the staining process on the biomolecules in histological sections. To investigate this issue, the authors analyzed DNA, RNA, and protein in immunostained, microdissected samples. DNA was the most robust molecule, exhibiting no significant change in quality after immunostaining but a variable 50% to 75% decrease in the total yield. In contrast, RNA in frozen and ethanol-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples was susceptible to hydrolysis and digestion by endogenous RNases during the initial steps of staining. Proteins from immunostained tissues were successfully analyzed by one-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry but were less amenable to solution phase assays. Overall, the results suggest investigators can use immunoguided microdissection methods for important analytic techniques; however, continued improvements in staining protocols and molecular extraction methods are key to further advancing the capability of these methods.

Citing Articles

Interstitial deletion of the Apc locus in β-catenin-overexpressing cells is a signature of radiation-induced intestinal tumors in C3B6F1 ApcMin/+ mice†.

Yanagihara H, Morioka T, Yamazaki S, Yamada Y, Tachibana H, Daino K J Radiat Res. 2023; 64(3):622-631.

PMID: 37117033 PMC: 10215001. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad021.


Effect of Antigen Retrieval on Genomic DNA From Immunodissected Samples.

Johann D, Shin I, Roberge A, Laun S, Peterson E, Liu M J Histochem Cytochem. 2022; 70(9):643-658.

PMID: 36129255 PMC: 9527476. DOI: 10.1369/00221554221124163.


Robust Acquisition of Spatial Transcriptional Programs in Tissues With Immunofluorescence-Guided Laser Capture Microdissection.

Zhang X, Hu C, Huang C, Wei Y, Li X, Hu M Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:853188.

PMID: 35399504 PMC: 8990165. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.853188.


Laser capture microdissection: techniques and applications in liver diseases.

Aguilar-Bravo B, Sancho-Bru P Hepatol Int. 2019; 13(2):138-147.

PMID: 30600479 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-018-9917-3.


Laser capture microdissection protocol for gene expression analysis in the brain.

Garrido-Gil P, Fernandez-Rodriguez P, Rodriguez-Pallares J, Labandeira-Garcia J Histochem Cell Biol. 2017; 148(3):299-311.

PMID: 28560490 DOI: 10.1007/s00418-017-1585-1.


References
1.
Charboneau L, Tory H, Scott H, Chen T, Winters M, Petricoin 3rd E . Utility of reverse phase protein arrays: applications to signalling pathways and human body arrays. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2004; 1(3):305-15. DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/1.3.305. View

2.
Gillio-Tos A, De Marco L, Fiano V, Garcia-Bragado F, Dikshit R, Boffetta P . Efficient DNA extraction from 25-year-old paraffin-embedded tissues: study of 365 samples. Pathology. 2007; 39(3):345-8. DOI: 10.1080/00313020701329757. View

3.
Callagy G, Jackson L, Caldas C . Comparative genomic hybridization using DNA from laser capture microdissected tissue. Methods Mol Biol. 2005; 293:39-55. View

4.
Perlmutter M, Best C, Gillespie J, Gathright Y, Gonzalez S, Velasco A . Comparison of snap freezing versus ethanol fixation for gene expression profiling of tissue specimens. J Mol Diagn. 2004; 6(4):371-7. PMC: 1867483. DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60534-X. View

5.
Wood H, Belvedere O, Conway C, Daly C, Chalkley R, Bickerdike M . Using next-generation sequencing for high resolution multiplex analysis of copy number variation from nanogram quantities of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38(14):e151. PMC: 2919738. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq510. View