» Articles » PMID: 21368043

A Regret-induced Status Quo Bias

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Mar 4
PMID 21368043
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A suboptimal bias toward accepting the status quo option in decision-making is well established behaviorally, but the underlying neural mechanisms are less clear. Behavioral evidence suggests the emotion of regret is higher when errors arise from rejection rather than acceptance of a status quo option. Such asymmetry in the genesis of regret might drive the status quo bias on subsequent decisions, if indeed erroneous status quo rejections have a greater neuronal impact than erroneous status quo acceptances. To test this, we acquired human fMRI data during a difficult perceptual decision task that incorporated a trial-to-trial intrinsic status quo option, with explicit signaling of outcomes (error or correct). Behaviorally, experienced regret was higher after an erroneous status quo rejection compared with acceptance. Anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex showed increased blood oxygenation level-dependent signal after such status quo rejection errors. In line with our hypothesis, a similar pattern of signal change predicted acceptance of the status quo on a subsequent trial. Thus, our data link a regret-induced status quo bias to error-related activity on the preceding trial.

Citing Articles

The baby duck syndrome as cognitive bias in user-interface interaction.

Glebko N, Kharitonova A, Kosova E, Gorbunova E Cogn Process. 2024; .

PMID: 39710767 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-024-01253-6.


Decision avoidance and post-decision regret: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Han Q, Quadflieg S, Ludwig C PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292857.

PMID: 37831709 PMC: 10575496. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292857.


Susceptibility to default effects does not differ by age.

Nolte J, Lockenhoff C J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022; 152(4):1175-1187.

PMID: 36355772 PMC: 10169537. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001317.


Distinguishing Active and Passive Outgroup Tolerance: Understanding Its Prevalence and the Role of Moral Concern.

Adelman L, Verkuyten M, Yogeeswaran K Polit Psychol. 2022; 43(4):731-750.

PMID: 36245788 PMC: 9542187. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12790.


Nudging Strategies for Arable Land Protection Behavior in China.

Zhang Y, Lu X, Zou Y, Lv T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19).

PMID: 36231906 PMC: 9566088. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912609.


References
1.
Feldman , Miyamoto , Loftus . Are Actions Regretted More Than Inactions?. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999; 78(3):232-255. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2833. View

2.
Critchley H, Mathias C, Dolan R . Fear conditioning in humans: the influence of awareness and autonomic arousal on functional neuroanatomy. Neuron. 2002; 33(4):653-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00588-3. View

3.
Singer T, Critchley H, Preuschoff K . A common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(8):334-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.05.001. View

4.
Kuhnen C, Knutson B . The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron. 2005; 47(5):763-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008. View

5.
Andersson J, Hutton C, Ashburner J, Turner R, Friston K . Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series. Neuroimage. 2001; 13(5):903-19. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0746. View