» Articles » PMID: 16672649

The Anterior Cingulate and Error Avoidance

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 May 5
PMID 16672649
Citations 82
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The precise role of the anterior cingulate cortex in monitoring, evaluating, and correcting behavior remains unclear despite numerous theories and much empirical data implicating it in cognitive control. The present event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study was able to separate monitoring from error-specific functions by allowing subjects to reject a trial so as to avoid errors. Cingulate and left dorsolateral prefrontal activity was greatest on rejection trials but comparable for correct and error trials, whereas an error-specific response was observed in bilateral insula. A dissociation was also observed between the cingulate and the nucleus accumbens with the latter more active for error than reject trials. These results reveal that the functional role of the cingulate is not particular to errors but instead is related to an evaluative function concerned with on-line behavioral adjustment in the service of avoiding losses.

Citing Articles

Practical, Economic, and Policy Implications of the Leve et al. Paper.

Fishbein D, Roman J Prev Sci. 2024; 25(8):1200-1206.

PMID: 39565440 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-024-01756-w.


General mechanisms of task engagement in the primate frontal cortex.

Grohn J, Khalighinejad N, Jahn C, Bongioanni A, Schuffelgen U, Sallet J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):4802.

PMID: 38839745 PMC: 11153620. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49128-w.


Olfactory Categorization Is Shaped by a Transmodal Cortical Network for Evaluating Perceptual Predictions.

Pierzchajlo S, Jernsather T, Fontana L, Almeida R, Olofsson J J Neurosci. 2024; 44(22).

PMID: 38561229 PMC: 11140662. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1232-23.2024.


Success versus failure in cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing.

Cieslik E, Ullsperger M, Gell M, Eickhoff S, Langner R Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023; 156:105468.

PMID: 37979735 PMC: 10976187. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105468.


Early Action Error Processing Is Due to Domain-General Surprise, Whereas Later Processing Is Error Specific.

Choo Y, Mather A, Wessel J J Neurosci. 2023; 43(45):7678-7689.

PMID: 37833065 PMC: 10634573. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1334-23.2023.


References
1.
Hester R, Fassbender C, Garavan H . Individual differences in error processing: a review and reanalysis of three event-related fMRI studies using the GO/NOGO task. Cereb Cortex. 2004; 14(9):986-94. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh059. View

2.
Critchley H, Mathias C, Dolan R . Neuroanatomical basis for first- and second-order representations of bodily states. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(2):207-12. DOI: 10.1038/84048. View

3.
MacDonald 3rd A, Cohen J, Stenger V, Carter C . Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science. 2000; 288(5472):1835-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835. View

4.
Paus T, Koski L, Caramanos Z, Westbury C . Regional differences in the effects of task difficulty and motor output on blood flow response in the human anterior cingulate cortex: a review of 107 PET activation studies. Neuroreport. 1998; 9(9):R37-47. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199806220-00001. View

5.
Cox R . AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res. 1996; 29(3):162-73. DOI: 10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014. View