» Articles » PMID: 21352609

Safety and Efficacy of Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine Versus Artemether-lumefantrine in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria in Zambian Children

Overview
Journal Malar J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Tropical Medicine
Date 2011 Mar 1
PMID 21352609
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Malaria in Zambia remains a public health and developmental challenge, affecting mostly children under five and pregnant women. In 2002, the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria was changed to artemether-lumefantrine (AL) that has proved to be highly efficacious against multidrug resistant Plasmodium falciparum.

Objective: The study objective was to determine whether dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA/PQP) had similar efficacy, safety and tolerability as AL for the treatment of children with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in Ndola, Zambia.

Methods: Between 2005 and 2006, 304 children (6-59 months old) with uncomplicated P. falciparum were enrolled, randomized to AL (101) or DHA/PQP (203) and followed up for 42 days. Outcome of treatment was defined according to the standard WHO classification, i.e. early treatment failure (ETF), late clinical failure (LCF, late parasitological failure (LPF) and adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR). Recurrent infections were genotyped to distinguish between recrudescence and new infection.

Results: No ETF was observed. At day 28, PCR-uncorrected ACPR was 92% in the DHA/PQP and 74% in the AL arm (OR: 4.05; 95%CI: 1.89-8.74; p < 0.001). Most failure were new infections and PCR-corrected ACPR was similar in the two study arms (OR: 0.69; 95%CI: 0.22-2.26; p = 0.33). Similar results were observed for day 42, i.e. higher PCR-uncorrected ACPR for DHA/PQP, mainly due to the difference observed up to day 28, while the PCR-corrected ACPR was similar: DHA/PQP: 93% (179/192), AL: 93% (84/90), (OR: 0.92; 95%CI: 0.30-2.64; p = 0.85). Except for cough, more frequent in the DHA/PQP arm (p = 0.04), there were no differences between treatment arms in the occurrence of adverse events. Two serious adverse events were probably associated to AL treatment.

Conclusion: DHA/PQP was as efficacious, safe and well tolerated in treatment of uncomplicated malaria as AL, though in the latter group more new infections during the follow up were observed. DHA/PQP seems a potential candidate to be used as an alternative first-line or rescue treatment in Zambia.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN16263443, at http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn.

Citing Articles

Safety of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria among children in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Assefa D, Zeleke E, Molla W, Mengistu N, Sefa A, Mebratu A Malar J. 2022; 21(1):4.

PMID: 34983552 PMC: 8725395. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-04032-2.


Efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria among children in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Assefa D, Yismaw G, Makonnen E Malar J. 2021; 20(1):340.

PMID: 34384431 PMC: 8359548. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03873-1.


Efficacy and safety of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Ugandan children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Assefa D, Zeleke E, Bekele D, Tesfahunei H, Getachew E, Joseph M Malar J. 2021; 20(1):174.

PMID: 33794897 PMC: 8017896. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03711-4.


Impact of substandard and falsified antimalarials in Zambia: application of the SAFARI model.

Jackson K, Higgins C, Laing S, Mwila C, Kobayashi T, Ippolito M BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):1083.

PMID: 32646393 PMC: 7350731. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08852-w.


The Impact of Malaria on Liver Enzymes: A Retrospective Cohort Study (2010-2017).

Cheaveau J, Marasinghe D, Akakpo S, Deardon R, Naugler C, Chin A Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019; 6(6):ofz234.

PMID: 31263731 PMC: 6592410. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz234.


References
1.
Whitty C, Staedke S . Artemisinin-based combination treatment for malaria in Africa: no perfect solutions. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(8):1087-8. DOI: 10.1086/444464. View

2.
Ratcliff A, Siswantoro H, Kenangalem E, Maristela R, Wuwung R, Laihad F . Two fixed-dose artemisinin combinations for drug-resistant falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: an open-label randomised comparison. Lancet. 2007; 369(9563):757-765. PMC: 2532500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60160-3. View

3.
Kamya M, Yeka A, Bukirwa H, Lugemwa M, Rwakimari J, Staedke S . Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treatment of malaria: a randomized trial. PLoS Clin Trials. 2007; 2(5):e20. PMC: 1876597. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020. View

4.
Piola P, Fogg C, Bajunirwe F, Biraro S, Grandesso F, Ruzagira E . Supervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005; 365(9469):1467-73. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66416-1. View

5.
Khan A, Maguire M . Relative chloroquine resistance of P falciparum in Zambia. Br Med J. 1978; 1(6128):1669-70. PMC: 1605473. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6128.1669. View