Treatment of Paediatric Malaria During a Period of Drug Transition to Artemether-lumefantrine in Zambia: Cross Sectional Study
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To evaluate treatment practices for uncomplicated malaria after the policy change from chloroquine to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and to artemether-lumefantrine in Zambia.
Design: Cross sectional survey.
Setting: Outpatient departments of all government and mission facilities in four districts in Zambia.
Participants: 944 children with uncomplicated malaria seen by 103 health workers at 94 health facilities.
Main Outcome Measures: Antimalarial prescriptions in accordance with national guidelines and influence of factors on health workers' decision to prescribe artemether-lumefantrine.
Results: Artemether-lumefantrine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and chloroquine were available, respectively, at 48 (51%), 94 (100%), and 71 (76%) of the 94 facilities. Of 944 children with uncomplicated malaria, only one child (0.1%) received chloroquine. Among children weighing less than 10 kg, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was commonly prescribed in accordance with guidelines (439/550, 79.8%). Among the children weighing 10 kg or more, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was commonly prescribed (266/394, 68%), whereas recommended artemether-lumefantrine was prescribed for only 42/394 (11%) children. Among children weighing 10 kg or more seen at facilities where artemether-lumefantrine was available, the same pattern was observed: artemether-lumefantrine was prescribed for only 42/192 (22%) children and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine remained the drug of choice (103/192, 54%). Programmatic activities such as in-service training and provision of job aids did not seem to influence the prescribing of artemether with lumefantrine.
Conclusion: Although the use of chloroquine for uncomplicated malaria was successfully discontinued in Zambia, the change of drug policy towards artemether-lumefantrine does not necessarily translate into adequate use of this drug at the point of care.
Arsenault C, Rowe S, Ross-Degnan D, Peters D, Roder-DeWan S, Kruk M BMJ Qual Saf. 2021; 31(2):123-133.
PMID: 34006598 PMC: 8784997. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011717.
Tindana P, de Haan F, Amaratunga C, Dhorda M, van der Pluijm R, Dondorp A Malar J. 2021; 20(1):119.
PMID: 33639946 PMC: 7910789. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03649-7.
Suarez-Sanchez P, Garcia B, Nzang J, Ncogo P, Riloha M, Berzosa P PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0220789.
PMID: 31374107 PMC: 6677319. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220789.
Taylor C, Linn A, Wang W, Florey L, Moussa H Malar J. 2019; 18(1):258.
PMID: 31358005 PMC: 6664566. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2892-x.
Case management of malaria in Swaziland, 2011-2015: on track for elimination?.
Dlamini S, Kosgei R, Mkhonta N, Zulu Z, Makadzange K, Zhou S Public Health Action. 2018; 8(Suppl 1):S3-S7.
PMID: 29713586 PMC: 5912419. DOI: 10.5588/pha.17.0047.