» Articles » PMID: 21327129

Biocontainment Strategies for Live Lactic Acid Bacteria Vaccine Vectors

Overview
Journal Bioeng Bugs
Date 2011 Feb 18
PMID 21327129
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stability is an important issue when engineering bacteria for use as live vaccine vectors. For the majority of live bacterial vaccines, the antigen-encoding gene is either plasmid located or integrated into the chromosome. Regardless, several safety concerns can be raised for both instances. One concern when using plasmid-encoded antigens is the transfer of antibiotic resistance markers. Alternatively, for chromosomal integrated antigens however, the concern focuses on the spread and possible release of genetically-modified microorganisms (GMM) into the environment, which is problematic. Their recombinant nature calls for a proper bio-containment strategy to be implemented or in place before any realistic attempt at releasing a live bacterial vaccine. No examples of human bacterial vaccines causing problems among animals have been found in the literature but the possibility exists and has to be both tested and evaluated before release of a live bacterial vaccine. The ideal GMM for use in humans should therefore contain the minimal amount of foreign DNA and must not include an antibiotic resistance marker. Furthermore, the possibilities of transgene horizontal transfer must be minimized, and GMM lethality for biocontainment should be achieved in an unconfined environment.

Citing Articles

Recombinant Vaccine Delivery Vehicle: A Promising Tool to Treat Infections and Combat Antimicrobial Resistance.

Dieye Y, Nguer C, Thiam F, Diouara A, Fall C Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(12).

PMID: 36551358 PMC: 9774608. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11121701.


Probiotic engineering strategies for the heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides.

Mejia-Pitta A, Broset E, de la Fuente-Nunez C Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021; 176:113863.

PMID: 34273423 PMC: 8440409. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113863.


Novel Strategies for Efficient Production and Delivery of Live Biotherapeutics and Biotechnological Uses of : The Lactic Acid Bacterium Model.

Tavares L, de Jesus L, da Silva T, Barroso F, Batista V, Coelho-Rocha N Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8:517166.

PMID: 33251190 PMC: 7672206. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.517166.


Safety Aspects of Genetically Modified Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Plavec T, Berlec A Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2).

PMID: 32098042 PMC: 7074969. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020297.


Analysis of Immune Responses in Mice Orally Immunized with Recombinant pMG36e-SP-TSOL18/ and pMG36e-TSOL18/ Vaccines of .

Zhou B, Sun J, Li X, Zhang Y, Luo B, Jiang N J Immunol Res. 2018; 2018:9262631.

PMID: 30581878 PMC: 6276433. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9262631.


References
1.
MacCormick C, Griffin H, Gasson M . Construction of a food-grade host/vector system for Lactococcus lactis based on the lactose operon. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995; 127(1-2):105-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07457.x. View

2.
Repa A, Grangette C, Daniel C, Hochreiter R, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Thalhamer J . Mucosal co-application of lactic acid bacteria and allergen induces counter-regulatory immune responses in a murine model of birch pollen allergy. Vaccine. 2003; 22(1):87-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00528-0. View

3.
Hols P, Kleerebezem M, Schanck A, Ferain T, Hugenholtz J, Delcour J . Conversion of Lactococcus lactis from homolactic to homoalanine fermentation through metabolic engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 1999; 17(6):588-92. DOI: 10.1038/9902. View

4.
Schweder T, Hofmann K, Hecker M . Escherichia coli K12 relA strains as safe hosts for expression of recombinant DNA. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995; 42(5):718-23. DOI: 10.1007/BF00171951. View

5.
Toomey N, Monaghan A, Fanning S, Bolton D . Assessment of antimicrobial resistance transfer between lactic acid bacteria and potential foodborne pathogens using in vitro methods and mating in a food matrix. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2009; 6(8):925-33. DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0278. View